Network detection and response · RankedExtraHop RevealX
ExtraHop RevealX is a network detection and response product from ExtraHop · extrahop.com ↗
Strongest at enterprise. Ranked 102 of 103 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Sophos NDR is first at 16%.
Vectra AI Platform is first at 24%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Vectra AI Platform is first at 24%.
Why models recommend it
“Consistently ranked as a leader in G2's Momentum Grid for NDR, ExtraHop is praised for high satisfaction and momentum scores.”Mistral Small · Comparative question · first choice
“For deepest network forensics: Choose ExtraHop or NetWitness.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
“ExtraHop — Excellent visibility, strong ML, easy UI.”Grok 4.20 · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“or ExtraHop (for forensic depth)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Noted for: Being more of a network monitoring company than cybersecurity-focused”MiniMax M2.5 · Negative question · warning
“ExtraHop — enterprise-grade pricing”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Premium tools such as Darktrace or ExtraHop may be powerful, but calculate sensor, storage, packet-processing, integration, and analyst costs over several years”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“Good but often pricier / more enterprise-oriented: ExtraHop and Vectra AI ... not usually the first pick when budget is the primary constraint”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as ExtraHop RevealX, over the 104 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 84 | 20 | Compare → | |
| 70 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 55 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 0 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 17 | 9 | View → | |
| 14 | 0 | View → | |
| 11 | 8 | View → |
What the models named instead of ExtraHop RevealX →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on ExtraHop RevealX's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- enterprise security teams
- Certifications
- FedRAMP
- Customers named
- Home Depot, Viasat, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Ulta Beauty
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 99 of the 104 answers that named ExtraHop RevealX and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
242 of the 276 domain citations in answers naming ExtraHop RevealX came from a third party's page. Seventeen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,502 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | EDR, SIEM | |
| Report or ebook | 71 | 0 | 2025-08-18 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Case study | 53 | 0 | 2018-11-28 | ||
| News or press | 46 | 1 | 2026-07-22 | SIEM | |
| Template or tool | 33 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 32 | 0 | 2026-02-04 | EDR, SIEM | |
| Comparison | 26 | 0 | 2024-01-29 | XDR, SIEM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | 2 | 2026-09-04 | XDR, SOAR | |
| Conference or event | 22 | 0 | 2025-07-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 21 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | CSPM, XDR |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09What is a harness and why it matters to security leaders glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-04Context harness model a new operating model for the agentic soc webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-12What is context the foundation for ai era security glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-04Defending against ai powered adversary webinar or virtual event
- 2026-07-22Agentic soc alliance news or press
- 2026-06-235 kubernetes threats behind real world breaches and how to defend against them blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page extrahop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (14); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.