4 categories · RankedStellar Cyber Open XDR
Stellar Cyber Open XDR is an extended detection and response product from Stellar Cyber, designed to ingest data from security tools an organization already owns · stellarcyber.ai ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Sophos NDR is first at 16%.
Vectra AI Platform is first at 24%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Vectra AI Platform is first at 24%.
Why models recommend it
“Stellar Cyber is recommended for enterprises with limited staff and budget”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Stellar Cyber Open XDR is emerging as the top specialized pick”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Stellar Cyber Open XDR – best for flexibility / no lock-in.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“Stellar Cyber Open XDR is the most commonly recommended budget-conscious commercial platform for SMBs 1-50 employees.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“generally less specialized/autonomous than the pure-play startups above for a standalone mid-sized setup”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Evaluate Stellar Cyber, though it is better viewed as Open XDR than pure NDR.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Stellar Cyber Open XDR, over the 102 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36 | 13 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 33 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 27 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 27 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 5 | View → | |
| 24 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → | |
| 19 | 6 | View → | |
| 19 | 3 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Stellar Cyber Open XDR →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Stellar Cyber Open XDR's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- Enterprise leaders; MSSPs
- Price stated
- predictable pricing
- Customers named
- Sumitomo Chemical, RSM US, University of Zurich, Boise State University, CoopCentral
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 101 of the 102 answers that named Stellar Cyber Open XDR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
221 of the 283 domain citations in answers naming Stellar Cyber Open XDR came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 428 | 4 | 2026-09-03 | XDR, SIEM | |
| News or press | 428 | 6 | 2026-09-16 | XDR, EDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 201 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Comparison | 54 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Conference or event | 20 | 0 | 2026-04-08 | XDR | |
| Report or ebook | 16 | 0 | 2023-11-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Case study | 4 | 0 | 2024-04-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2024-02-08 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-04-29 | SIEM |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Top identity security platforms glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24Non human identity nhi glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24Autonomous agent security platforms glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24Itdr vs iam comparison
- 2026-09-24Ai in endpoint security glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-16Stellar cyber and eset bring premium threat intelligence to ai driven secops news or press
Events in person
- April 8, 2026RSAC Conference 2026San Francisco · attended
As the event pages on stellarcyber.ai state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page stellarcyber.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.