Index › IT › Security operations › NDR › Corelight Open NDR vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Network detection and response · November 2026 Edition

Corelight Open NDR vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Zero of fourteen models named Corelight Open NDR first on the direct prompt; zero named Cisco Secure Network Analytics. Corelight Open NDR was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Cisco Secure Network Analytics by fourteen and Corelight Open NDR carries 33 labels and Cisco Secure Network Analytics 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Corelight Open NDR

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3325A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Corelight Open NDR reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Vectra AI Platform was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Vectra AI Platform vs Corelight Open NDR · Vectra AI Platform vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics · ExtraHop Reveal vs Corelight Open NDR

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network detection and response page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Corelight Open NDRFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCisco Secure Network Analytics
Direct001 against Corelight Open NDR
Paraphrase00
Comparative01
Budget-constrained111 against Corelight Open NDR · 1 against Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Corelight Open NDR · 2 against Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Corelight Open NDR and Cisco Secure Network Analytics were named in the same answer fifty-nine times, of the 111 answers naming Corelight Open NDR and the 86 naming Cisco Secure Network Analytics. In those answers Cisco Secure Network Analytics took the first choice two times and Corelight Open NDR four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Corelight Open NDR and Cisco Secure Network Analytics stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Corelight Open NDR Cisco Secure Network Analytics first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Corelight Open NDR on the left and Cisco Secure Network Analytics on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Corelight Open NDR and Cisco Secure Network Analytics stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniVectra AI Platform alternatives: Corelight Open NDR, Darktrace, ExtraHop Reveal
Perplexity SonarVectra AI Platform alternatives: Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Corelight Open NDR, Darktrace, ExtraHop RevealX, FortiNDR
Grok 4.20Vectra AI Platform alternatives: Corelight Open NDR, Darktrace, ExtraHop RevealX, Stellar Cyber Open XDR
Llama 4 MaverickExtraHop Reveal, Vectra AI Platform alternatives: Corelight Open NDR, Gatewatcher AIonIQ, ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer
Qwen 3.7 FlashVectra AI Platform alternatives: Corelight Open NDR, ExtraHop Reveal
GLM 4.7 FlashXDarktrace alternatives: Arista NDR, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, ExtraHop Reveal, Vectra AI Platform

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Vectra AI Platform alternatives: Darktrace, ExtraHop RevealX, Muninn
Gemini 3.5 FlashExtraHop Reveal, Vectra AI Platform alternatives: Darktrace, Fortinet FortiNDR, Sophos NDR, Stellar Cyber Open XDR
Mistral SmallTrend Vision One, Vectra AI Platform alternatives: Darktrace, ExtraHop RevealX
DeepSeek V4 FlashVectra AI Platform alternatives: Darktrace, ExtraHop Reveal
Kimi K2Vectra AI Platform alternatives: ExtraHop Reveal, Trend Vision One, WatchGuard ThreatSync+ NDR
MiniMax M2.5ExtraHop Reveal alternatives: Arista NDR, Darktrace
GPT-6 LunaVectra AI Platform alternatives: Darktrace, ExtraHop RevealX
Muse Glimmer 30BManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer alternatives: Vectra AI Platform

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Corelight Open NDR0%#11 of 15
Cisco Secure Network Analytics0%#13 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Corelight Open NDR2%#4 of 10
Cisco Secure Network Analytics2%#5 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Cisco Secure Network Analytics leads by six points.
Cisco Secure Network Analytics10%#3 of 8
Corelight Open NDR4%#5 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Corelight Open NDR

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“One reviewer cited limits on custom alerting and potentially significant costs for some cloud monitoring setups.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“over pricier alternatives like Vectra AI, Darktrace, ExtraHop Reveal(x), or Corelight” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Originally IDS-focused; evaluate if you need full response capabilities” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“The best NDR platform for a company with a limited budget is Corelight or Cisco Secure Network Analytics.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Evidence- and hunting-oriented, built around Zeek network data... Threat-hunting teams that value detailed investigation, customization, and data portability.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · alternative
“If budget = $0 for software, build on Zeek/Suricata-based open NDR such as Corelight Open NDR, accepting higher operational cost.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Multiple concerns from users: Complex setup and configuration ... High false positive rates” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“a fraction of the cost of tier-1 enterprise brands (like Palo Alto Networks or Cisco)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Mixed but generally functional in enterprise settings. Cisco can feel legacy” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best NDR platform for a company with a limited budget is Corelight or Cisco Secure Network Analytics.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Traditional Enterprise Network | Darktrace or Cisco Secure Network Analytics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“designed to monitor massive, globally distributed enterprise networks, with native integration into Cisco network infrastructure” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.