Insider risk management · November 2026 Edition
ActivTrak vs Cyberhaven
Zero of fourteen models named ActivTrak first on the direct prompt; zero named Cyberhaven. ActivTrak was named by ten of the fourteen models and Cyberhaven by nine and ActivTrak carries 13 labels and Cyberhaven 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1315A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ActivTrak reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs ActivTrak · Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Cyberhaven · Teramind vs ActivTrak
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the insider risk management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ActivTrakFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCyberhaven
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative012 against Cyberhaven
Budget-constrained401 against ActivTrak
Scale-constrained01
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ActivTrak and Cyberhaven stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
ActivTrak Cyberhaven first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ActivTrak on the left and Cyberhaven on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ActivTrak and Cyberhaven stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashCode42 Incydr alternatives: Cyberhaven, DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Grok 4.20Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Cyberhaven, Safetica, Teramind
Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Above Security, Code42 alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind, eMonitor
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Code42 Incydr, ManageEngine Log360, Teramind
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Above Security, Code42 Incydr, Safetica, Teramind
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Above Security, Code42 Incydr, DTEX Systems, Teramind
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, OSense, Varonis Data Security Platform
Kimi K2Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Safetica Intelligent Data Security Platform, Teramind
MiniMax M2.5Code42 Incydr, Teramind alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
GPT-6 LunaCode42 Incydr alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Muse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind alternatives: Above Security, DTEX InTERCEPT, Varonis Data Security Platform
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ActivTrak leads by seven points.
ActivTrak7%#3 of 11Cyberhaven0%#– of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
ActivTrak leads by five points.
ActivTrak7%#4 of 13Cyberhaven2%#7 of 13Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
ActivTrak0%#– of 13Cyberhaven0%#10 of 13What the models said about ActivTrak
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“I wouldn't choose ActivTrak as an insider-risk tool: its published plans focus on workforce activity and productivity.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · hard negative
“Best Overall Value & Free Tier: ActivTrak ... frequently cited as the best option for SMBs because it offers a robust free version” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For SMBs, start with Teramind for deep monitoring with transparent pricing or ActivTrak for a free workforce-visibility baseline.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“ActivTrak is the best no-cost starting point” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cyberhaven
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“currently lacks integration breadth and cross-domain behavioral coverage compared to leaders” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Mid-market solutions (e.g., Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Cyberhaven, or DTEX) that balance depth with manageability.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Cyberhaven for full‑lifecycle data lineage, or Nightfall AI for AI‑native detection with low false positives.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs ActivTrakMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs CyberhavenTeramind vs ActivTrakTeramind vs CyberhavenCode42 Incydr vs ActivTrakCode42 Incydr vs CyberhavenActivTrak vs Proofpoint Insider Threat ManagementActivTrak vs ApployeActivTrak vs DTEX SystemsProofpoint Insider Threat Management vs CyberhavenApploye vs CyberhavenCyberhaven vs DTEX SystemsAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full insider risk standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.