Digital risk protection · November 2026 Edition
Cyble Vision vs Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
One of fourteen models named Cyble Vision first on the direct prompt; zero named Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection. Cyble Vision was named by nine of the fourteen models and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection by fourteen and Cyble Vision carries 15 labels and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 46, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share5%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%33%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1546A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cyble Vision reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Cyble Vision · SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection · ZeroFox vs Cyble Vision
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital risk protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Cyble VisionFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Direct102 against Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Paraphrase013 against Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Comparative03
Budget-constrained105 against Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Scale-constrained00
Negative005 against Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cyble Vision and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Cyble Vision Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cyble Vision on the left and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cyble Vision and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection stood in it.
Cyble Vision first, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection not the choice
1 of 14 modelsRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Cyble Vision alternatives: BlueVoyant Sky: DRP, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSight
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Doppel, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Perplexity SonarUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: BlueVoyant Sky: DRP, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest Digital Shadows, ZeroFox
Grok 4.20SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Cyble Vision
Mistral SmallZeroFox alternatives: Cyberint, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
Qwen 3.7 FlashUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: Cyble Vision
GLM 4.7 FlashXZeroFox alternatives: Doppel, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSight
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Gemini 3.5 FlashFlare alternatives: Bolster, Rapid7 Threat Command, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFox
DeepSeek V4 FlashSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: ZeroFox
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2CTM360, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Fortra Brand Protection, ZeroFox
MiniMax M2.5SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFox
GPT-6 LunaSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Bolster, Fortra Brand Protection
Muse Glimmer 30BSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CloudSEK XVigil, Cyberint
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Cyble Vision0%#9 of 10Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection0%#10 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
Cyble Vision leads by two points.
Cyble Vision5%#5 of 13Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection2%#6 of 13Enterprise
The order flips: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection leads at enterprise.
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection22%#2 of 11Cyble Vision6%#3 of 11What the models said about Cyble Vision
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“best for mid-market organizations that want broad DRP coverage with AI-assisted triage without an enterprise-tier price point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Cyble Vision offers breadth of coverage at a generally more accessible price point and appeals to mid-market buyers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid - Recorded Future and ZeroFox are excellent but are built for enterprise budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Recorded Future - mentioned as being a "criticized challenger" and having a high negative rate.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Tight Budgets: Enterprise-heavy options like Recorded Future” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Recorded Future is widely considered the leader in threat intelligence. They have the broadest data sources” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need deep intel and context, go with Recorded Future or CloudSEK XVigil.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“positions itself as the most comprehensive DRP platform for large enterprises” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Cyble VisionSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFox vs Cyble VisionZeroFox vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFlare vs Cyble VisionFlare vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionUpGuard BreachSight vs Cyble VisionUpGuard BreachSight vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full DRP standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.