Two of fourteen models named ZeroFox first on the direct prompt; zero named Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection. Both were named by all fourteen models and ZeroFox carries 60 labels and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 46, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital risk protection page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ZeroFox and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection were named in the same answer 127 times, of the 179 answers naming ZeroFox and the 138 naming Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection. In those answers Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection took the first choice sixteen times and ZeroFox twenty-four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid: Enterprise-only DRP tools (like ZeroFox or Recorded Future) unless you have a dedicated security budget of $100,000+ per year.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Tight Budgets: Enterprise-heavy options like Recorded Future, ZeroFox, or Rapid7 often start at $20,000–$50,000+/year” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“ZeroFox - mentioned as having a high negative rate and being criticized for its focus on visibility rather than disruption.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Strong for brand and executive threat coverage across social media and external platforms, suitable for SMB through enterprise with modular options.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“ZeroFox is widely recognized for its deep coverage across social media, mobile app stores, and digital channels.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose ZeroFox if impersonation, executive threats, social media, or brand abuse are priorities.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid - Recorded Future and ZeroFox are excellent but are built for enterprise budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Recorded Future - mentioned as being a "criticized challenger" and having a high negative rate.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Tight Budgets: Enterprise-heavy options like Recorded Future” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Recorded Future is widely considered the leader in threat intelligence. They have the broadest data sources” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need deep intel and context, go with Recorded Future or CloudSEK XVigil.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“positions itself as the most comprehensive DRP platform for large enterprises” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.