One of fourteen models named Flare first on the direct prompt; zero named Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection. Flare was named by ten of the fourteen models and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection by fourteen and Flare carries 16 labels and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 46, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital risk protection page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Flare and Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 65 answers naming Flare and the 138 naming Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection. In those answers Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection took the first choice four times and Flare six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“~$19,600+ (based on identifiers) | Proactive monitoring ... Higher entry for even modest needs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Choose [Flare](https://flare.io) if your primary concern is secret leaks (GitHub), dark web credential exposure, and keeping alert fatigue low” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“I recommend Flare (formerly known as Flare.io) as the top choice for integrated dark web and brand impersonation monitoring.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Flare is specifically highlighted as the "strongest mid-market pick" for dark web monitoring” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid - Recorded Future and ZeroFox are excellent but are built for enterprise budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Recorded Future - mentioned as being a "criticized challenger" and having a high negative rate.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Tight Budgets: Enterprise-heavy options like Recorded Future” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Recorded Future is widely considered the leader in threat intelligence. They have the broadest data sources” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need deep intel and context, go with Recorded Future or CloudSEK XVigil.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“positions itself as the most comprehensive DRP platform for large enterprises” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.