Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › DLP › Netskope DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Data loss prevention · November 2026 Edition

Netskope DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Zero of fourteen models named Netskope DLP first on the direct prompt; zero named Netwrix Endpoint Protector. Netskope DLP was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Netwrix Endpoint Protector by ten and Netskope DLP carries 27 labels and Netwrix Endpoint Protector 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Netskope DLP

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2720A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Netskope DLP reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Purview DLP was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview DLP vs Netskope DLP · Microsoft Purview DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector · Safetica ONE vs Netskope DLP

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data loss prevention page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Netskope DLPFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNetwrix Endpoint Protector
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained10
Negative101 against Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Netskope DLP and Netwrix Endpoint Protector were named in the same answer sixteen times, of the 88 answers naming Netskope DLP and the 73 naming Netwrix Endpoint Protector. In those answers Netwrix Endpoint Protector took the first choice two times and Netskope DLP zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Netskope DLP and Netwrix Endpoint Protector stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Netskope DLP Netwrix Endpoint Protector first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Netskope DLP on the left and Netwrix Endpoint Protector on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Netskope DLP and Netwrix Endpoint Protector stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Safetica ONE alternatives: Kitecyber, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Netskope Next-Gen DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Strac
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE, Strac
Grok 4.20Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Safetica ONE
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
Qwen 3.7 FlashSafetica ONE alternatives: DoControl, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI
Kimi K2Next DLP alternatives: Microsoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI
Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Netskope DLP0%#10 of 14
Netwrix Endpoint Protector0%#5 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Netskope DLP2%#5 of 15
Netwrix Endpoint Protector2%#7 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Netskope DLP leads by six points.
Netskope DLP6%#3 of 13
Netwrix Endpoint Protector0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Netskope DLP

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Mid-market DLP solutions from Microsoft Purview, Proofpoint, Netskope, or Forcepoint often hit the sweet spot” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Modern "Cloud-Native" DLP solutions (like Netskope or Strac) tend to score higher on G2 reviews” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd consider Netskope instead if your main challenge is controlling data across a mix of SaaS apps, web traffic, cloud services, and endpoints.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · alternative

What the models said about Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“customer reviews frequently criticize the platform for slow customer support and a cluttered, unintuitive management console” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Endpoint Protector (Best Overall Value) - This is widely considered the best "value" solution for SMBs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“If hardware peripherals (USBs, external drives) and cross-OS local files are your main audit requirement: Evaluate Netwrix Endpoint Protector.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
“Endpoint\u2011focused teams with a strong insider\u2011risk program may lean on Netwrix Endpoint Protector or Teramind.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Purview DLP vs Netskope DLPMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorSafetica ONE vs Netskope DLPSafetica ONE vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorTeramind DLP vs Netskope DLPTeramind DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorNightfall AI vs Netskope DLPNightfall AI vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorNetskope DLP vs CyberhavenNetskope DLP vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPCyberhaven vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorNetwrix Endpoint Protector vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DLP standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.