Index › IT › Security operations › Client-side protection › cside vs Feroot PaymentGuard
Client-side protection · November 2026 Edition

cside vs Feroot PaymentGuard

Four of fourteen models named cside first on the direct prompt; zero named Feroot PaymentGuard. cside was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Feroot PaymentGuard by ten and cside carries 28 labels and Feroot PaymentGuard 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

cside

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Feroot PaymentGuard

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share18%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2814A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, cside reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.cside vs Cloudflare Page Shield · cside vs Feroot Security · cside vs Reflectiz

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client-side protection page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
csideFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFeroot PaymentGuard
Direct40
Paraphrase31
Comparative301 against Feroot PaymentGuard
Budget-constrained201 against cside · 1 against Feroot PaymentGuard
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Feroot PaymentGuard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, cside and Feroot PaymentGuard were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 83 answers naming cside and the 42 naming Feroot PaymentGuard. In those answers Feroot PaymentGuard took the first choice zero times and cside eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where cside and Feroot PaymentGuard stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
cside Feroot PaymentGuard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, cside on the left and Feroot PaymentGuard on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where cside and Feroot PaymentGuard stood in it.

cside first, Feroot PaymentGuard not the choice

4 of 14 modelsFeroot PaymentGuard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.20cside alternatives: Feroot Security, Reflectiz
Mistral SmallFeroot Security, cside alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, otto-js
GLM 4.7 FlashXcside alternatives: Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Reflectiz
Muse Glimmer 30Bcside alternatives: Reflectiz

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
DeepSeek V4 FlashFeroot Security alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Reflectiz, cside
Kimi K2Feroot Security, Reflectiz alternatives: cside

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 minino first choice
Gemini 3.5 FlashReflectiz alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Perplexity SonarSource Defense alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashFeroot Security alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare, HUMAN Security, Source Defense
MiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: ESET Endpoint Security
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender for Cloud alternatives: Sophos Intercept X

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
cside leads by seventeen points.
cside17%#2 of 11
Feroot PaymentGuard0%#10 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
cside leads by sixteen points.
cside18%#1 of 10
Feroot PaymentGuard2%#6 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
cside leads by fourteen points.
cside14%#2 of 12
Feroot PaymentGuard0%#11 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about cside

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“While it may have a cost, it's designed for businesses that need comprehensive protection and can provide value for money.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · soft negative
“cside's free forever tier and $99/mo self-serve start is the most affordable specialist in the category” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose cside when complete real-session visibility and PCI evidence are the priority.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“cside stands out as the top client-side protection tool for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Feroot PaymentGuard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“those from Reflectiz, Feroot, Human Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense ... ineffective against sophisticated attacks” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools to be cautious about or avoid include: ... 3. Feroot PaymentGuard” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Feroot samples down to 10% of sessions, meaning it statistically misses 90% of client-side attacks in unobserved sessions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Feroot PaymentGuard or Cside” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Feroot when compliance automation across multiple regulations is the main buying criterion.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“Feroot focuses on identifying and patching vulnerabilities within the client-side code itself” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.