Website and synthetic monitoring · November 2026 Edition
Site24x7 vs New Relic Synthetics
One of fourteen models named Site24x7 first on the direct prompt; zero named New Relic Synthetics. Site24x7 was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and New Relic Synthetics by thirteen and Site24x7 carries 28 labels and New Relic Synthetics 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eleven categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2831A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Site24x7 reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Better Stack was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. UptimeRobot vs Site24x7 · UptimeRobot vs New Relic Synthetics · Better Stack vs Site24x7
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the website and synthetic monitoring page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Site24x7First choices, of fourteen modelsNew Relic Synthetics
Direct102 against New Relic Synthetics
Paraphrase12
Comparative10
Budget-constrained001 against Site24x7
Scale-constrained001 against New Relic Synthetics
Negative001 against New Relic Synthetics
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Site24x7 and New Relic Synthetics stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Site24x7 New Relic Synthetics first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Site24x7 on the left and New Relic Synthetics on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Site24x7 and New Relic Synthetics stood in it.
Site24x7 first, New Relic Synthetics not the choice
1 of 14 modelsNew Relic Synthetics was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Better Stack, Site24x7 alternatives: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Pingdom alternatives: Atlassian, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic Synthetics, Statuspage, UptimeRobot
GPT-5.4 miniPingdom alternatives: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Site24x7, UptimeRobot
Grok 4.20UptimeRobot alternatives: Better Stack, Site24x7
Muse Glimmer 30BBetter Stack, Hyperping alternatives: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Pingdom, Site24x7, UptimeRobot
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Gemini 3.5 FlashBetter Stack alternatives: Checkly, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, StatusCake
Perplexity SonarBetter Stack alternatives: Checkly, Uptime.com, UptimeRobot
Mistral SmallUptimeRobot alternatives: Better Stack
DeepSeek V4 FlashBetter Stack alternatives: Uptime.com, UptimeRobot
Llama 4 MaverickUptimeRobot alternatives: Better Stack, Checkly, Paessler PRTG, Pingdom
Qwen 3.7 FlashUptimeRobot alternatives: Better Stack, Pingdom
Kimi K2StatusCake alternatives: Better Stack, Uptime.com
GLM 4.7 FlashXUptimeRobot alternatives: Better Stack, Hyperping
GPT-6 LunaBetter Stack alternatives: Checkly, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Site24x7 leads by four points.
Site24x77%#3 of 12New Relic Synthetics4%#6 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Site24x74%#5 of 11New Relic Synthetics4%#6 of 11Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Site24x70%#9 of 14New Relic Synthetics0%#10 of 14What the models said about Site24x7
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about New Relic Synthetics
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Often considered overkill for small to midsize businesses and can be expensive.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“These add significant depth but higher cost and complexity.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Overkill (and expensive) for uptime monitoring alone.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend New Relic as the best balance of cost, capability, and ease of adoption” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: New Relic” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Site24x7 or New Relic (both offer strong synthetic + RUM/DEM bundles with good mid-market pricing” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
UptimeRobot vs Site24x7UptimeRobot vs New Relic SyntheticsBetter Stack vs Site24x7Better Stack vs New Relic SyntheticsDatadog Synthetic Monitoring vs Site24x7Datadog Synthetic Monitoring vs New Relic SyntheticsCheckly vs Site24x7Checkly vs New Relic SyntheticsSite24x7 vs Uptime KumaSite24x7 vs PingdomNew Relic Synthetics vs Uptime KumaNew Relic Synthetics vs PingdomAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full uptime monitoring standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.