Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager
One of fourteen models named Zabbix first on the direct prompt; five named ManageEngine OpManager. Both were named by all fourteen models and Zabbix carries 49 labels and ManageEngine OpManager 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network monitoring and management page.
By framing
ZabbixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsManageEngine OpManager
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Zabbix and ManageEngine OpManager were named in the same answer ninety-eight times, of the 358 answers naming Zabbix and the 239 naming ManageEngine OpManager. In those answers ManageEngine OpManager took the first choice eighteen times and Zabbix eleven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Zabbix ManageEngine OpManager first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zabbix on the left and ManageEngine OpManager on the right.The direct prompt
Zabbix first, ManageEngine OpManager an alternative
1 of 14 modelsManageEngine OpManager was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.ManageEngine OpManager first, Zabbix an alternative
5 of 14 modelsZabbix was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Zabbix13%#3 of 11ManageEngine OpManager2%#6 of 11Zabbix27%#1 of 12ManageEngine OpManager24%#2 of 12ManageEngine OpManager15%#2 of 15Zabbix2%#9 of 15What the models said about Zabbix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Free/Open Source. Extremely powerful and customizable, but requires significant Linux/sysadmin expertise to maintain and tune. Only choose this if you have strong engineering talent.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“The best network monitoring tool for a company with a limited budget is Zabbix, as it is open-source and free to self-host” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about ManageEngine OpManager
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Part of a product line with frequent critical flaws ... High attack surface if not hardened.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“1. ManageEngine OpManager - a holistic network management software for performance monitoring, fault diagnosis, and troubleshooting.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.