InfluxDB vs VictoriaMetrics
One of fourteen models named InfluxDB first on the direct prompt; zero named VictoriaMetrics. Both were named by all fourteen models and InfluxDB carries 76 labels and VictoriaMetrics 57, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the time series databases page.
By framing
InfluxDBFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVictoriaMetrics
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, InfluxDB and VictoriaMetrics were named in the same answer 138 times, of the 222 answers naming InfluxDB and the 165 naming VictoriaMetrics. In those answers VictoriaMetrics took the first choice nineteen times and InfluxDB twenty.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
InfluxDB VictoriaMetrics first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, InfluxDB on the left and VictoriaMetrics on the right.The direct prompt
InfluxDB first, VictoriaMetrics an alternative
1 of 14 modelsVictoriaMetrics was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
13 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
InfluxDB16%#2 of 8VictoriaMetrics7%#3 of 8InfluxDB13%#2 of 10VictoriaMetrics11%#3 of 10InfluxDB14%#2 of 12VictoriaMetrics10%#3 of 12What the models said about InfluxDB
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“avoid InfluxDB 3 Core (OSS) for production unless your use case genuinely fits within 72-hour retention and 5 databases” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“When to avoid: If stability, easy upgrades, or long-term maintenance are priorities. Many teams are migrating away” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“InfluxDB 3 is a different generation from v1/v2, and its Core edition has documented query-range limitations that may matter for historical analytics.” GPT-6 Luna · scale prompt · soft negative
“InfluxDB is considered the best overall reference point for broad time series workloads spanning metrics, IoT, and real-time analytics with strong ingest.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“TimescaleDB (if using PostgreSQL) or InfluxDB Open Source tend to offer the best balance of features, performance, and cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with InfluxDB if you want a proven, well-supported solution with a managed cloud option and extensive integrations.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about VictoriaMetrics
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“its cluster design prioritizes availability over consistency, and moving data from single-node to cluster requires re-ingestion” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“not ideal for logs, events, or diversified time series data” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose established options like Prometheus, VictoriaMetrics, or ClickHouse for most use cases” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“Often praised as a drop-in Influx replacement—stable, efficient, Prometheus-compatible, and scalable.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Monitoring / long-term metrics with minimal operational burden and storage cost → VictoriaMetrics.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.