Seven of fourteen models named Secoda first on the direct prompt; zero named DataHub. Secoda was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and DataHub by fourteen and Secoda carries 26 labels and DataHub 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data catalogs and governance page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Secoda and DataHub were named in the same answer fifty-six times, of the 81 answers naming Secoda and the 126 naming DataHub. In those answers DataHub took the first choice two times and Secoda twenty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“mentioned as being "criticized challengers" or having negative reviews” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want the cheapest, fastest adoption with AI-assisted search, Secoda is the most common mid-market recommendation today.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Secoda is frequently highlighted as the strongest recommendation for most mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Strongest fit for ~500 employees): *Examples:* Atlan, Select Star, Secoda, CastorDoc, DataHub” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Clunky/difficult interface compared to commercial alternatives ... Open-source options (DataHub) viable but require engineering investment” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Open-source or niche tools (like DataHub, Amundsen, Marquez) Caution level: Low-to-moderate (only if you lack engineering resources)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“plus OpenMetadata or DataHub if you're willing to take on more of the operational and engineering work” GPT-6 Luna · scale prompt · soft negative
“The Heavyweight Champion: DataHub ... is generally considered the most mature and widely adopted open-source data catalog” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Mid-market solutions (Atlan, select, DataHub) often fit better than enterprise-only tools (Collibra) at this scale” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Strongest fit for ~500 employees): *Examples:* Atlan, Select Star, Secoda, CastorDoc, DataHub (Cloud/Acryl Data).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.