Eight of fourteen models named Atlan first on the direct prompt; zero named Alation. Both were named by all fourteen models and Atlan carries 57 labels and Alation 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data catalogs and governance page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Atlan and Alation were named in the same answer 140 times, of the 178 answers naming Atlan and the 171 naming Alation. In those answers Alation took the first choice eight times and Atlan forty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“What to Avoid ... Enterprise tools like Collibra, Alation, or Atlan — Excellent products, but typically cost $50K–$200K+ annually.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid expensive enterprise tools like Collibra ($100k+/year), Alation, and Atlan at this stage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“far more practical than paid tools like Alation, Collibra, or Atlan” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Consider OpenMetadata (if you have engineering capacity) or Atlan (a modern, lighter alternative often praised for better UX and AI features) to start.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“If you are multi-cloud / Snowflake / Databricks / modern SaaS data and want fast adoption with AI context and a business-friendly catalog: Atlan.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Modern / Active Metadata Platforms (Strongest fit for ~500 employees): *Examples:* Atlan, Select Star, Secoda, CastorDoc, DataHub (Cloud/Acryl Data).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid ... Enterprise tools like Collibra, Alation, or Atlan — Excellent products, but typically cost $50K–$200K+ annually.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“priced at $60K–$198K+/year and works best with a mature governance program (15+ catalogers)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid expensive enterprise tools like Collibra ($100k+/year), Alation, and Atlan” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“If your priority is user adoption and AI-driven discovery, look toward Alation.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd lean Alation when the goal is fast adoption and cross-functional governance” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Generally Positive (The Standards): Alation, Collibra, Fiddler, and Microsoft Purview (with caveats on complexity) are generally viewed as robust” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.