Two of fourteen models named Okta Verify first on the direct prompt; zero named Google Authenticator. Okta Verify was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Google Authenticator by thirteen and Okta Verify carries 53 labels and Google Authenticator 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the multi-factor authentication page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Okta Verify and Google Authenticator were named in the same answer forty-five times, of the 150 answers naming Okta Verify and the 76 naming Google Authenticator. In those answers Google Authenticator took the first choice six times and Okta Verify seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid premium-heavy tools like Okta (can get expensive)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Okta Verify without advanced features... These can still fall to AiTM phishing, session token theft, or prompt bombing.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Push-based MFA (e.g., Microsoft Authenticator without number matching, Duo Push, Okta Verify) is vulnerable to” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For enterprises with broad app portfolios: Okta Adaptive MFA, OneLogin, and Microsoft Entra ID offer the most comprehensive IAM + MFA capabilities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best overall approach is Microsoft Entra ID or Okta, configured to use passkeys/FIDO2 security keys as the default MFA method” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Okta Identity Cloud ... Okta is generally the industry leader.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid for mid-size: Pure consumer tools like Google Authenticator (too basic, no central management)” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Google Authenticator is too basic” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“TOTP authenticator apps – e.g., Google Authenticator, Authy. They are stronger than SMS/email, but the 6-digit codes can be phished in real time” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“For the absolute tightest budget, Google Authenticator (free) combined with strong password policies is the best starting point” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If you are on a budget the free ones are Microsoft Authenticator and Google's Authenticator.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with authenticator apps combined with your platform's built-in MFA features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.