Index › IT › Identity and access › MFA › Cisco Duo vs Google Authenticator
Multi-factor authentication · November 2026 Edition

Cisco Duo vs Google Authenticator

Eleven of fourteen models named Cisco Duo first on the direct prompt; zero named Google Authenticator. Cisco Duo was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Google Authenticator by thirteen and Cisco Duo carries 66 labels and Google Authenticator 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Cisco Duo

endorsed leader

Named in six categories this edition.

Google Authenticator

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share43%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%44%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels6632A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cisco Duo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Entra ID was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Cisco Duo vs Microsoft Entra ID · Cisco Duo vs Okta Verify · Cisco Duo vs Microsoft Authenticator

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the multi-factor authentication page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Cisco DuoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGoogle Authenticator
Direct1101 against Google Authenticator
Paraphrase1001 against Google Authenticator
Comparative204 against Google Authenticator
Budget-constrained542 against Google Authenticator
Scale-constrained20
Negative001 against Cisco Duo · 6 against Google Authenticator
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Cisco Duo and Google Authenticator were named in the same answer sixty-two times, of the 237 answers naming Cisco Duo and the 76 naming Google Authenticator. In those answers Google Authenticator took the first choice ten times and Cisco Duo twenty.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cisco Duo and Google Authenticator stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Cisco Duo Google Authenticator first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cisco Duo on the left and Google Authenticator on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cisco Duo and Google Authenticator stood in it.

Cisco Duo first, Google Authenticator not the choice

11 of 14 modelsGoogle Authenticator was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cisco Duo alternatives: JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Gemini 3.5 FlashCisco Duo alternatives: Auth0, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, WorkOS
Perplexity SonarCisco Duo alternatives: JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Grok 4.20Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Mistral SmallCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID alternatives: Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA
DeepSeek V4 FlashCisco Duo alternatives: Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID
Llama 4 MaverickCisco Duo alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Kimi K2Cisco Duo alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
GLM 4.7 FlashXCisco Duo alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID
MiniMax M2.5Cisco Duo alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID
Muse Glimmer 30BCisco Duo alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verify alternatives: Cisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra ID alternatives: Cisco Duo, Okta Verify

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verify

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cisco Duo leads by thirty points.
Cisco Duo37%#1 of 10
Google Authenticator7%#4 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Cisco Duo leads by thirty-seven points.
Cisco Duo43%#1 of 11
Google Authenticator6%#4 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Cisco Duo leads by twenty-one points.
Cisco Duo21%#2 of 8
Google Authenticator0%#8 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Cisco Duo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Legacy or basic versions of popular solutions (e.g., older Duo...): These can still fall to AiTM phishing, session token theft, or prompt bombing.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Need fast rollout, minimal training, hybrid on-prem/cloud | Cisco Duo (broad protocol support, device trust, low admin overhead)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Cisco Duo and Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) are both highly recommended multi-factor authentication (MFA) tools” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best MFA solution for a company with a limited budget is Duo Free or Google Authenticator for under 10 users.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Google Authenticator

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid for mid-size: Pure consumer tools like Google Authenticator (too basic, no central management)” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Google Authenticator is too basic” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“TOTP authenticator apps – e.g., Google Authenticator, Authy. They are stronger than SMS/email, but the 6-digit codes can be phished in real time” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“For the absolute tightest budget, Google Authenticator (free) combined with strong password policies is the best starting point” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If you are on a budget the free ones are Microsoft Authenticator and Google's Authenticator.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with authenticator apps combined with your platform's built-in MFA features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.