Two of fourteen models named Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard first on the direct prompt; zero named Promon SHIELD. Both were named by all fourteen models and Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard carries 54 labels and Promon SHIELD 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the application shielding page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard and Promon SHIELD were named in the same answer eighty-two times, of the 155 answers naming Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard and the 97 naming Promon SHIELD. In those answers Promon SHIELD took the first choice two times and Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard twenty-three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Do not go with Jscrambler or enterprise-tier tools (Appdome, Guardsquare, Zimperium)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid as a first choice on a tight budget: Appdome or Guardsquare” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“When evaluating commercial app shielding vendors (such as Guardsquare, Promon, Digital.ai, Appdome, PreEmptive, Zimperium, etc.), watch for these specific drawbacks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Guardsquare is the code-level benchmark, unifying continuous mobile app security testing (MAST) with polymorphic code hardening, and RASP.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Guardsquare is widely considered the gold standard for mobile app protection, combining advanced code obfuscation with automated RASP.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“DexGuard if you need the broadest mobile app protection, especially if you care about code hardening and anti-tamper protections.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“commercial app shielding vendors (such as Guardsquare, Promon, Digital.ai, Appdome, PreEmptive, Zimperium, etc.), watch for these specific drawbacks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“competitors like Guardsquare or Promon, which typically require custom quotes and cost thousands per month” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“often cost-prohibitive, with licenses frequently running tens of thousands of dollars annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“My default pick would be Promon Shield for Mobile” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Promon is a trusted choice for RASP and application shielding, and their solution is used by various industries worldwide.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Known for high-performance post-compile protection and runtime self-protection (RASP) with minimal impact on app latency” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.