Application shielding · RankedPromon SHIELD
Promon SHIELD is an application shielding product that protects mobile apps at runtime, with anti-tamper and runtime application self-protection (RASP) capabilities · promon.io ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Appdome is first at 23%.
Appdome is first at 36%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Appdome is first at 51%.
Why models recommend it
“My default pick would be Promon Shield for Mobile”GPT-6 Luna · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Promon is a trusted choice for RASP and application shielding, and their solution is used by various industries worldwide.”Llama 4 Maverick · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Known for high-performance post-compile protection and runtime self-protection (RASP) with minimal impact on app latency”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Verimatrix XTD, Appdome, Zimperium MAPS, or Promon for stronger combinations of obfuscation + RASP + attestation”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“commercial app shielding vendors (such as Guardsquare, Promon, Digital.ai, Appdome, PreEmptive, Zimperium, etc.), watch for these specific drawbacks”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“competitors like Guardsquare or Promon, which typically require custom quotes and cost thousands per month”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“often cost-prohibitive, with licenses frequently running tens of thousands of dollars annually”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“What to avoid on a tight budget”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Promon SHIELD, over the 97 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 23 | Compare → | |
| 81 | 35 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 0 | View → | |
| 28 | 0 | View → | |
| 27 | 0 | View → | |
| 19 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 14 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Promon SHIELD →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Promon SHIELD's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- banks, fintechs and enterprises
- Certifications
- ISO 27001, DORA, SOC 2
- Customers named
- Raiffeisenbank, MONETA Money Bank, Cirosec gmbh, Wultra, SecureMetric, F5
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 89 of the 97 answers that named Promon SHIELD and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
257 of the 333 domain citations in answers naming Promon SHIELD came from a third party's page. Thirty-seven were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 73 | 0 | 2026-06-12 | App shielding | |
| Case study | 17 | 0 | 2025-01-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2026-03-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2025-01-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-06-17Mobile face authentication security checklist for banks in asia template or tool
- 2026-06-12Mobile deepfake attack playbook banks asia blog
- 2026-06-02Psd3 mobile evidence checklist 10 questions banks and psps must answer now template or tool
- 2026-05-21Mobile apps under psd3 and eu psr blog
- 2026-03-12On prem vs cloud for mobile app protection a guide for choice comparison
- 2025-10-22Resilience pentest readiness checklist for mobile apps template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page promon.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.