Application shielding · November 2026 Edition
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard vs AppSealing
Two of fourteen models named Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard first on the direct prompt; zero named AppSealing. Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and AppSealing by four and Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard carries 54 labels and AppSealing 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share15%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels5410A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Appdome was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Appdome vs Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard · Appdome vs AppSealing · Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard vs Approov
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the application shielding page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAppSealing
Direct20
Paraphrase211 against Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard
Comparative80
Budget-constrained305 against Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard
Scale-constrained00
Negative103 against Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard and AppSealing stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard AppSealing first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard on the left and AppSealing on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard and AppSealing stood in it.
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard first, AppSealing an alternative
2 of 14 modelsAppSealing was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashGuardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard alternatives: AppSealing, PreEmptive Dotfuscator, Promon SHIELD
Qwen 3.7 FlashAppdome, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard alternatives: Zimperium MAPS
Neither was the first choice, one was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5DoveRunner AppSealing alternatives: Appdome, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard
Perplexity SonarAppdome alternatives: DoveRunner AppSealing, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard, Promon SHIELD, Zimperium MAPS
Grok 4.20Appdome alternatives: Approov, Arxan, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard, Promon SHIELD
Mistral SmallAppdome alternatives: Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard, Promon SHIELD
DeepSeek V4 FlashAppdome alternatives: DoveRunner AppSealing, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard, Promon SHIELD
Kimi K2Appdome alternatives: Arxan, DoveRunner AppSealing, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard, Promon SHIELD
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppdome alternatives: Appknox, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard, PreEmptive Dotfuscator, Zimperium Mobile Application Protection Suite
MiniMax M2.5Appdome alternatives: Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard, Promon SHIELD
GPT-6 LunaAppdome alternatives: Digital.ai Application Protection, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard
Muse Glimmer 30BAppdome alternatives: Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard, Promon SHIELD, Zimperium MAPS
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniAppdome alternatives: DexProtector, Promon SHIELD
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard leads by four points.
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard9%#3 of 9AppSealing4%#– of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard leads by thirteen points.
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard15%#2 of 12AppSealing2%#6 of 12Enterprise
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard leads by twenty-four points.
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard24%#2 of 9AppSealing0%#– of 9What the models said about Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Do not go with Jscrambler or enterprise-tier tools (Appdome, Guardsquare, Zimperium)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid as a first choice on a tight budget: Appdome or Guardsquare” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“When evaluating commercial app shielding vendors (such as Guardsquare, Promon, Digital.ai, Appdome, PreEmptive, Zimperium, etc.), watch for these specific drawbacks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Guardsquare is the code-level benchmark, unifying continuous mobile app security testing (MAST) with polymorphic code hardening, and RASP.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Guardsquare is widely considered the gold standard for mobile app protection, combining advanced code obfuscation with automated RASP.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“DexGuard if you need the broadest mobile app protection, especially if you care about code hardening and anti-tamper protections.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about AppSealing
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd recommend AppSealing as the most suitable option for a mid-sized B2B company” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Often praised for AI-driven shielding with competitive pricing—starts lower than enterprise tools” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · alternative
“If you need a no-code vendor tool without long enterprise contracts, evaluate AppSealing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Appdome vs Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuardAppdome vs AppSealingGuardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard vs ApproovGuardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard vs Promon SHIELDGuardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard vs DoveRunner AppSealingApproov vs AppSealingPromon SHIELD vs AppSealingDoveRunner AppSealing vs AppSealingAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full app shielding standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.