Cloud cost management
Asked as “cloud cost management platform”, and as “FinOps tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
55%
Clear leader
55Vantage09AWS Cost Explorer09CloudZero27others
55% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+10Since October 2026: 45% → 55%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Vantage held the lead, +10 points on 45%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vantage65%Clear leader▲+24Since October 2026: 41% → 65%, +24 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketVantage55%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 45% → 55%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
IBM Apptio Cloudability54%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 49% → 54%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Vantage65%Clear leader▲+24Since October 2026: 41% → 65%, +24 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketVantage55%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 45% → 55%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseIBM Apptio Cloudability54%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 49% → 54%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Vantage55%2%58endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 45% → 55%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.45% → 55%
Vantage55%2%58endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 45% → 55%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.45% → 55%02
CloudZero9%7%43accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 9%
CloudZero9%7%43accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 9%03
AWS Cost Explorer9%19%47accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 9%
AWS Cost Explorer9%19%47accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 9%04Kubecost5%0%35accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
05
Microsoft Cost Management4%19%36accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%
Microsoft Cost Management4%19%36accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%06
Google Cloud Cost Management Lab in the set4%6%16accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%
Google Cloud Cost Management Lab in the set4%6%16accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%07
OpenCost4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
OpenCost4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08IBM Apptio Cloudability4%37%52criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
IBM Apptio Cloudability4%37%52criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%09
VMware Tanzu CloudHealth2%51%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
VMware Tanzu CloudHealth2%51%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the ten products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16
Flexera One0%31%26criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Flexera One0%31%26criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%19
Datadog Cloud Cost Management0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Datadog Cloud Cost Management0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
nOps0%14%14accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
nOps0%14%14accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%11
CAST AI0%11%27accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CAST AI0%11%27accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%17
Spot by NetApp0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Spot by NetApp0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%18
Zesty0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Zesty0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
Google Cloud Billing Lab in the set0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Google Cloud Billing Lab in the set0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Finout0%8%36accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
Finout0%8%36accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%12
ProsperOps0%6%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
ProsperOps0%6%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%13
Harness Cloud Cost Management0%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Harness Cloud Cost Management0%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Cloud Cost Management is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models two times of 52. Google Cloud Billing is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Vantage vs Microsoft Cost ManagementVantage vs Google Cloud Cost ManagementVantage vs OpenCostVantage vs IBM Apptio CloudabilityCloudZero vs AWS Cost ExplorerCloudZero vs KubecostCloudZero vs Microsoft Cost ManagementCloudZero vs Google Cloud Cost ManagementCloudZero vs OpenCostCloudZero vs IBM Apptio CloudabilityAWS Cost Explorer vs KubecostAWS Cost Explorer vs Microsoft Cost ManagementAWS Cost Explorer vs Google Cloud Cost ManagementAWS Cost Explorer vs OpenCostAWS Cost Explorer vs IBM Apptio CloudabilityKubecost vs Microsoft Cost ManagementKubecost vs Google Cloud Cost ManagementKubecost vs OpenCostKubecost vs IBM Apptio CloudabilityMicrosoft Cost Management vs Google Cloud Cost ManagementMicrosoft Cost Management vs OpenCostMicrosoft Cost Management vs IBM Apptio CloudabilityGoogle Cloud Cost Management vs OpenCostGoogle Cloud Cost Management vs IBM Apptio CloudabilityOpenCost vs IBM Apptio Cloudability
One product takes 55% of first choices here, so the chart would put eighteen markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Four products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Qwen 3.7 Flash and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
IBM Apptio Cloudability37%
19 of 52 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“This model is cited as a reason to avoid, especially for enterprise tiers.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
VMware Tanzu CloudHealth51%
18 of 35 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools initially: Skip full FinOps platforms like CloudHealth, DoiT, nOps, Finout, or CAST AI” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Flexera One31%
8 of 26 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“Flexera and IBM Cloudability are less urgent avoids but are showing signs of legacy bloat and slower innovation.” Kimi K2, negative prompt
AWS Cost Explorer19%
9 of 47 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Free (or low cost), built directly into management consoles, but limited in cross-cloud normalization and container-level breakdown.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 778 links across 164 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 34 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Finout28 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Cloudaware28 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Amnic28 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Vantage24 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 39 citations · 8 models
vendor site · New Relic16 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Amazon15 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Eon15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cloud cost management platform”, “cloud cost management platform”, “cloud cost management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vantage vantage.sh | 55% | 190 | 49,500 | 10,715 | 37,252 | 4 | ||
| CloudZero cloudzero.com | 9% | 168 | 2,400 | 32 | 99,194 | $25,945 | 5 | 3 |
| AWS parent site AWS Cost Explorer 9% | 9% | 131 | 368,000 | 114,001 | ||||
| Kubecost | 5% | 1,000 | 25 | |||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Cost Management 4% | 4% | 97 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Google Cloud cloud.google.com Google Cloud Cost Management 4%, Google Cloud Billing 0% | 4% | 43 | 165,000 | 7,596 | 7,405,347 | |||
| OpenCost opencost.io | 4% | 25 | 480 | 11 | 422 | |||
| IBM parent site IBM Apptio Cloudability 4% | 4% | 204 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| Economize economize.cloud | 2% | 17 | 1,900 | 99,857 | 8,820 | 1 | ||
| Cost Explorer | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cloudaware.com). The first result for “best cloud cost management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best cloud cost management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which FinOps tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top cloud cost management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cloud cost management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a cloud cost management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cloud cost management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceVMware Tanzu CloudHealth, VantageChangedCloudZeroVantageno first choiceagainst: CloudZero, Datadog Cloud Cost Management, Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Microsoft Cost Management, Spot by NetApp
Two alternatives
Infracost, KubecostTen alternatives
CAST AI, Datadog Cloud Cost Management, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Infracost, Kubecost, OpenCost, ProsperOps, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, Zesty, nOpsSix alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CAST AI, Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost Management, ProsperOpsGPT-5.4 miniVantageAWS Cost ExplorerChangedCloudZero, VantageAWS Cost Explorerno first choiceagainst: CloudKeeper, DoiT Cloud Intelligence, IBM Apptio Cloudability, PointFive
Four alternatives
CloudZero, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Native Cloud Tools, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthTwo alternatives
AWS FinOps Agent, IBM Apptio CloudabilityTwelve alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CAST AI, Finout, Flexera One, Google Cloud Cost Management, Harness Cloud Cost Management, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost Management, ProsperOps, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, ZestyFive alternatives
Blacktip Refine Free, CloudKeeper, Google Cloud Billing exports, Microsoft Cost Management, VantageGemini 3.5 FlashCloudZeroagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Microsoft Cost Management, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthCloudZeroHeldagainst: IBM Apptio Cloudability, Microsoft Cost Management, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthCloudZero, Vantageagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost ManagementVantage.shagainst: IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthCloudZero, Vantageagainst: IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthagainst: CloudCheckr, IBM Apptio Cloudability, IBM Turbonomic, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Three alternatives
Finout, Kubecost, VantageThree alternatives
Finout, Kubecost, VantageSix alternatives
CAST AI, Finout, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Kubecost, ProsperOps, ZestyNine alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Cloud Custodian, Google Cloud Cost Management, Infracost, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost Management, OpenCost, ProsperOps, PumpOne alternative
KubecostPerplexity SonarVantageagainst: IBM Apptio CloudabilityVantageHeldIBM Apptio CloudabilityVantageagainst: CAST AIno first choiceagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, CAST AI, Densify, Eon, Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Microsoft Cost Management, ProsperOps, ScaleOps, Sedai, ServiceNow, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, Zesty, nOps
Five alternatives
CAST AI, CloudKeeper, CloudZero, Finout, KubecostSeven alternatives
CAST AI, CloudZero, Cloudaware, Finout, Kubecost, ProsperOps, nOpsTen alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CAST AI, CloudZero, Finout, Flexera One, Google Cloud Cost Management, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost Management, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, VantageFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost ManagementGrok 4.20Vantageagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Billing, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthCloudZero, VantageChangedagainst: IBM Apptio CloudabilityIBM Apptio CloudabilityAWS Cost Exploreragainst: CAST AI, DoiT Cloud Intelligence, Finout, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, nOpsIBM Apptio Cloudabilityagainst: CloudCheckr, CloudZero, Finout, IBM Apptio Cloudability
Two alternatives
CloudZero, FinoutTwo alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, FinoutFour alternatives
CloudZero, Finout, Flexera One, VantageSix alternatives
Economize, Google Cloud Billing, Infracost, Microsoft Cost Management, OpenCost, VantageFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Kubecost, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, VantageMistral SmallVantageVantageHeldagainst: Flexera One, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthno first choiceKubecost, Vantageno first choiceagainst: CloudCheckr, Finout, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Two alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CloudZeroTwo alternatives
DigitalEx, FinoutThree alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Economize, Microsoft Cost ManagementDeepSeek V4 FlashVantageagainst: VMware Tanzu CloudHealthVantageHeldCloudZero, Vantageagainst: IBM TurbonomicEconomize, Vantageagainst: CloudSpend, CloudZero, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthno first choiceagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Microsoft Cost Management, PointFive, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Three alternatives
CAST AI, CloudZero, EconomizeFour alternatives
CloudZero, Datadog Cloud Cost Management, Finout, KubecostEight alternatives
CAST AI, Control Plane, Finout, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Kubecost, ProsperOps, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, nOpsFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Cost Management + Advisor, CloudForecast, Google Cloud Cost ManagementLlama 4 MaverickVantageVantageHeldno first choiceVantageno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cloudaware, Economize, SpendArkQwen 3.7 FlashVantageIBM Apptio CloudabilityChangedFlexera One, IBM Apptio CloudabilityVantageKubecostagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Advisor, Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, Densify, IBM Apptio Cloudability, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Cloud Control, SAP Cloud ALM, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Four alternatives
Amnic, CAST AI, CloudZero, nOpsThree alternatives
Harness Cloud Cost Management, Kubecost, Moovit.aiFour alternatives
CloudZero, Finout, Spot by NetApp, VantageFive alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Billing, Infracost, Microsoft Cost Management, OpenCostKimi K2VantageVantageHeldFinoutVantageno first choiceagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, Microsoft Cost Managementagainst: Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Two alternatives
CloudZero, EconomizeTwo alternatives
CloudZero, FinoutEight alternatives
CAST AI, CloudZero, Datadog Cloud Cost Management, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Kubecost, ProsperOps, Vantage, nOpsSeven alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Advisor, CloudQuell, Google Cloud Cost Management, Infracost, Kubecost, OpenCostGLM 4.7 FlashXVantageVantageHeldVantageagainst: Datadog Cloud Cost ManagementAWS Cost Explorer, OpenCostno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
CAST AI, Cloudaware, IBM Apptio Cloudability, nOpsFour alternatives
CloudZero, Datadog Cloud Cost Management, Finout, nOpsSeven alternatives
CAST AI, CloudZero, Finout, Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, OpenCost / Kubecost, nOpsFour alternatives
Cloud Custodian, Kubecost, Pump, VantageMiniMax M2.5VantageVantageHeldVantageagainst: AWS Cost ExplorerAWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost Managementno first choicenothing named
One alternative
EconomizeFour alternatives
DoiT Cloud Intelligence, Finout, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthFive alternatives
CAST AI, Kubecost, OpenCost, Spot by NetApp, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthThree alternatives
Economize, Infracost, VantageGPT-6 LunaCloudZeroVantageChangedno first choiceCost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost Managementno first choiceagainst: Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Two alternatives
Finout, VantageOne alternative
CloudZeroTen alternatives
CloudZero, Datadog Cloud Cost Management, Finout, Flexera One, Harness Cost Management Agent, IBM Apptio Cloudability, OpenCost / Kubecost, ProsperOps, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, VantageOne alternative
VantageMuse Glimmer 30BVantageVantageHeldno first choiceKubecost, OpenCostno first choiceagainst: Datadog Cloud Cost Management, Flexera One, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, Vantage
Three alternatives
CloudZero, Finout, IBM Apptio CloudabilityTwo alternatives
CloudZero, FinoutTen alternatives
CAST AI, CloudZero, Cloudaware, Control Plane, Flexera One, IBM, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Kubecost, Vantage, nOpsSix alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Economize, Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost Management, Pump View, VantageBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:15 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:45 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:27 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:44 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:38 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:27 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:26 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:28 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:47 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:07 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 17 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 13 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:37 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:51 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:59 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 15 | 71 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 11 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:58 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:57 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:37 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:59 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:58 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 20 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:28 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 10 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:04 | no | 0 | 67 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:05 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:39 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:51 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:34 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:20 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:47 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 25 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:26 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS Billing and Cost Management read as AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Cost Explorer + Budgets read as AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Cost Explorer plus AWS Budgets read as AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Cost Explorer/Budgets read as AWS Cost Explorer
AWS-native (Cost Explorer + Compute Optimizer) read as AWS Cost Explorer
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud Cost Management
DoiT read as DoiT Cloud Intelligence
Flexera read as Flexera One
Flexera (RightScale) read as Flexera One
Flexera One FinOps read as Flexera One
Flexera One Finops read as Flexera One
Google Cloud read as Google Cloud Cost Management
Google Cloud's cost-management tools read as Google Cloud Cost Management
Harness read as Harness Cloud Cost Management
Harness (Cost Module) read as Harness Cloud Cost Management
Harness Cost Management read as Harness Cloud Cost Management
New Relic read as New Relic Cloud Cost Intelligence
Spot by NetApp read as Spot by NetApp
Spot by NetApp (Spot.io) read as Spot by NetApp
VMware Aria Cost read as VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Unresolved, counted raw
Antimetal
Blacktip Refine Free
CloudSpend
Datadog CCM
DigitalEx
Ethos
Google Cloud Billing exports
Harness Cost Management Agent
IBM Planning Analytics
KUDOS (AWS open-source)
Microsoft Cost Manage
Moovit.ai
Nuvemshare
Oracle Cloud Control
SAP Cloud ALM
Zesty.io
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.