Workhuman is employee recognition and rewards software for businesses · workhuman.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Bonusly is first at 61%.
Bonusly is first at 58%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Awardco is first at 29%.
“Choose Workhuman/Achievers if you need deep analytics, global scalability, and alignment with formal performance goals.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“If you are a large global company requiring strict compliance & deep analytics: Choose Workhuman or Achievers”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Workhuman | Social recognition + talent marketplace | Organizations valuing culture and employee engagement”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · alternative
“Best if you want a more enterprise-style recognition program with stronger administration/reporting”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Not overly enterprise-heavy like Achievers or Workhuman”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Workhuman, over the 104 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | 7 | View → | |
| 74 | 14 | View → | |
| 68 | 14 | View → | |
| 36 | 0 | View → | |
| 34 | 1 | View → | |
| 31 | 2 | View → | |
| 26 | 1 | View → | |
| 25 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Workhuman →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Workhuman's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 95 of the 104 answers that named Workhuman and are not a share of its labels.
289 of the 321 domain citations in answers naming Workhuman came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 690 | undated | Performance management, People analytics | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 61 | undated | |||
| Case study | 33 | undated | Recognition and rewards | ||
| Comparison | 22 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 19 | 1 | 2026-10-20 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on workhuman.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page workhuman.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (14); 5 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.