Index › HR › Products › Pin › Alternatives · November 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Pin, as AI models named them

In the November 2026 Edition, 451 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where Pin holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 451 answers that did not name Pin, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Talent intelligence

Performance and talent management. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Pin is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessPin is #1 of 18 here at 14% of first choices, 25 labels.

Sixty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Pin; it was the first choice in nine. The first choices in those sixty-three answers, twenty-three products in all, the eight most named:

15 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketPin is #3 of 15 here at 12% of first choices, 15 labels.

Seventy-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Pin; it was the first choice in six. The first choices in those seventy-three answers, twenty-one products in all, the eight most named:

13 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterprisePin holds 1 label here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Pin; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-three answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:

4 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Recruiting CRM and sourcing

Talent acquisition. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Pin is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessPin holds 7 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name Pin; it was the first choice in four. The first choices in those seventy-seven answers, twenty-four products in all, the eight most named:

Juicebox11 of 77
Manatal8 of 77
100Hires3 of 77
Breezy HR3 of 77
Noon3 of 77
16 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketPin is #9 of 13 here at 4% of first choices, 13 labels.

Seventy-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Pin; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those seventy-four answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

Gem12 of 74
hireEZ7 of 74
Lever4 of 74
Ashby3 of 74
Crelate3 of 74
SeekOut3 of 74
Fetcher2 of 74
9 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterprisePin holds 6 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name Pin; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-one answers, twenty-one products in all, the eight most named:

SeekOut14 of 81
Gem8 of 81
Avature5 of 81
hireEZ5 of 81
Beamery4 of 81
SAP Ariba4 of 81
iCIMS4 of 81
13 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Pin neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Pin only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Pin's side.

The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Pin was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.