Greenhouse vs Paradox
Three of fourteen models named Greenhouse first on the direct prompt; zero named Paradox. Greenhouse was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Paradox by thirteen and Greenhouse carries 34 labels and Paradox 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI recruiting assistants page.
By framing
GreenhouseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsParadox
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Greenhouse and Paradox were named in the same answer eighty times, of the 456 answers naming Greenhouse and the 221 naming Paradox. In those answers Paradox took the first choice four times and Greenhouse five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Greenhouse Paradox first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Greenhouse on the left and Paradox on the right.The direct prompt
Greenhouse first, Paradox an alternative
3 of 14 modelsParadox was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Greenhouse0%#10 of 11Paradox0%#9 of 11Paradox8%#3 of 13Greenhouse2%#9 of 13What the models said about Greenhouse
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Avoid Greenhouse unless you specifically need enterprise-grade structured hiring workflows and are comfortable with custom pricing in the $10K+ range.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
What the models said about Paradox
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Paradox's Olivia leads conversational screening and scheduling for high-volume hiring” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Automated Screening & Scheduling: Paradox (Olivia)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.