Index › HR › Compensation and total rewards › Pay equity › Salary.com Pay Equity vs CompUp
Pay equity · November 2026 Edition

Salary.com Pay Equity vs CompUp

Zero of fourteen models named Salary.com Pay Equity first on the direct prompt; zero named CompUp. Salary.com Pay Equity was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and CompUp by eleven and Salary.com Pay Equity carries 25 labels and CompUp 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Salary.com Pay Equity

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

CompUp

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share6%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate16%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2517A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Salary.com Pay Equity reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Syndio was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Figures vs Salary.com Pay Equity · Figures vs CompUp · Payscale vs Salary.com Pay Equity

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the pay equity page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Salary.com Pay EquityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCompUp
Direct00
Paraphrase12
Comparative10
Budget-constrained213 against Salary.com Pay Equity
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Salary.com Pay Equity
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Salary.com Pay Equity and CompUp stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Salary.com Pay Equity CompUp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Salary.com Pay Equity on the left and CompUp on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Salary.com Pay Equity and CompUp stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Workleap Compensation alternatives: Compport, Ravio, Salary.com Pay Equity, Syndio
Grok 4.20Figures alternatives: Aeqium, CompUp, HiBob, Pave
Kimi K2Syndio alternatives: HiBob, Parity Software, Salary.com Pay Equity, Trusaic PayParity
Muse Glimmer 30BFigures, Pave alternatives: ChartHop, CompUp, PayAnalytics, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity, beqom Pay Equity

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniPayscale alternatives: Syndio, beqom Pay Equity
Gemini 3.5 FlashSyndio alternatives: PayAnalytics, Payscale, Trusaic PayParity
Perplexity SonarPayAnalytics alternatives: Affirmity, CandorIQ, EEOPay, Figures
Mistral SmallCompport, Figures alternatives: Payscale, Syndio
DeepSeek V4 FlashPayscale alternatives: Aeqium, CompAnalyst Pay Equity Suite, Pave, PayAnalytics, Syndio
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashPayAnalytics alternatives: Pave, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
GLM 4.7 FlashXSyndio alternatives: Figures, PayAnalytics, Trusaic PayParity
MiniMax M2.5PayAnalytics, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity alternatives: Figures, Payscale
GPT-6 LunaPayAnalytics alternatives: Payscale, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CompUp leads by four points.
CompUp6%#5 of 13
Salary.com Pay Equity2%#9 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Salary.com Pay Equity6%#6 of 15
CompUp6%#7 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Salary.com Pay Equity leads at enterprise.
Salary.com Pay Equity6%#4 of 7
CompUp0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Salary.com Pay Equity

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“some Salary.com integrations, Korn Ferry, or Mercer AI features): Often criticized for embedding biases if not customized with a strong DEI lens” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“not budget-friendly for small firms: "Annual Licenses Start at $9,000/Year For 1-10 Employees"” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Salary.com lists its Pay Equity Suite starting at $9,000 per year—a substantial step up” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Tools like Syndio and Salary.com are often chosen when the main goal is finding, fixing, and defending pay decisions” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“CompUp (free/cheap) or Salary.com's CompAnalyst Pay Equity at $9K/year are the strongest value options” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Salary.com as the best default choice” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about CompUp

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.