Enrich vs Origin
Zero of fourteen models named Enrich first on the direct prompt; one named Origin. Enrich was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Origin by ten and Enrich carries 25 labels and Origin 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial wellness platforms page.
By framing
EnrichFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrigin
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Enrich and Origin were named in the same answer twenty-two times, of the 59 answers naming Enrich and the 47 naming Origin. In those answers Origin took the first choice two times and Enrich zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Enrich Origin first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Enrich on the left and Origin on the right.The direct prompt
Origin first, Enrich not the choice
1 of 14 modelsEnrich was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Enrich3%#9 of 13Origin3%#7 of 13Enrich2%#6 of 11Origin2%#7 of 11What the models said about Enrich
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“use per-employee pricing ($3–$25+/month), which adds up quickly” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“For a company on a tight budget, I'd start with Enrich's Essentials plan.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“AI-powered financial wellness platform - Highly customizable for different employee demographics” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for Employee Engagement (Modern UX) ... lives where your employees already work” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about Origin
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“$8+/employee/month | Brightside, Origin, or BrightPlan (more premium features)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Best Overall for Salaried & Tech/Knowledge Workers: Origin” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Origin or Morgan Stanley at Work when employees need equity-compensation, retirement, or sophisticated planning support.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Origin if: You need a comprehensive, all-in-one platform that handles budgeting, investing, equity, and net worth” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.