Hubstaff vs Clockify
One of fourteen models named Hubstaff first on the direct prompt; zero named Clockify. Hubstaff was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Clockify by nine and Hubstaff carries 54 labels and Clockify 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee monitoring page.
By framing
HubstaffFirst choices, of fourteen modelsClockify
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Hubstaff and Clockify were named in the same answer forty-eight times, of the 187 answers naming Hubstaff and the 150 naming Clockify. In those answers Clockify took the first choice nine times and Hubstaff five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Hubstaff Clockify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Hubstaff on the left and Clockify on the right.The direct prompt
Hubstaff first, Clockify not the choice
1 of 14 modelsClockify was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Hubstaff20%#2 of 11Clockify2%#7 of 11Hubstaff18%#2 of 10Clockify4%#5 of 10Hubstaff0%#8 of 10Clockify0%#– of 10What the models said about Hubstaff
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Hubstaff *measures the movement of the mouse and the speed of keyboard strokes to endure high levels of productivity.*” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best Value for Small Teams: Hubstaff and HiveDesk offer core features (screenshots, time tracking) at the lowest cost.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Hubstaff ... likely the strongest option for general-purpose remote team management” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Hubstaff stands out as one of the best employee monitoring tools for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Clockify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“or Clockify free for basic time tracking for up to 5 users. Both are repeatedly listed as best for small / transparent teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“If your budget is $0: Go with Clockify (desktop/office teams) or Jibble (field/mobile teams).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.