Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Employee monitoring › DeskTime vs Clockify
Employee monitoring · November 2026 Edition

DeskTime vs Clockify

Zero of fourteen models named DeskTime first on the direct prompt; zero named Clockify. DeskTime was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Clockify by nine and DeskTime carries 17 labels and Clockify 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

DeskTime

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Clockify

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels1712A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, DeskTime reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ActivTrak was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. ActivTrak vs DeskTime · ActivTrak vs Clockify · Hubstaff vs DeskTime

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee monitoring page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DeskTimeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsClockify
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained22
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against DeskTime
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where DeskTime and Clockify stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
DeskTime Clockify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, DeskTime on the left and Clockify on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where DeskTime and Clockify stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Insightful alternatives: ActivTrak, Teramind, eMonitor
GPT-5.4 miniActivTrak alternatives: Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind
Gemini 3.5 FlashActivTrak alternatives: Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind
Perplexity SonarActivTrak alternatives: Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, WorkTime
Grok 4.20ActivTrak alternatives: Hubstaff, Insightful
Mistral SmallActivTrak, Insightful alternatives: CurrentWare, Time Doctor
DeepSeek V4 FlashActivTrak alternatives: Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, Time Doctor
Llama 4 MaverickActivTrak
Qwen 3.7 FlashHubstaff alternatives: ActivTrak, Teramind, Time Doctor
Kimi K2ActivTrak alternatives: Hubstaff, Teramind, Time Doctor
GLM 4.7 FlashXInsightful alternatives: ActivTrak, BambooHR, Teramind, Veriato
MiniMax M2.5ActivTrak, Insightful alternatives: Teramind
GPT-6 LunaActivTrak alternatives: Hubstaff, Teramind
Muse Glimmer 30BActivTrak alternatives: Hubstaff, Teramind

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
DeskTime2%#8 of 11
Clockify2%#7 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
DeskTime4%#4 of 10
Clockify4%#5 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
DeskTime0%#– of 10
Clockify0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about DeskTime

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Include screen recording and idle detection. Less extreme but still risky if overused” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best employee monitoring tool for a company with a limited budget is DeskTime” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“DeskTime is the best affordable employee monitoring software for small teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Least invasive: actiTIME, ActivTrak, and DeskTime emphasize hours, activity patterns, and productivity trends” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative

What the models said about Clockify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“or Clockify free for basic time tracking for up to 5 users. Both are repeatedly listed as best for small / transparent teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“If your budget is $0: Go with Clockify (desktop/office teams) or Jibble (field/mobile teams).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
ActivTrak vs DeskTimeActivTrak vs ClockifyHubstaff vs DeskTimeHubstaff vs ClockifyInsightful vs DeskTimeInsightful vs ClockifyAll ten head-to-head pages and the full employee monitoring standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.