hireEZ vs Loxo
Two of fourteen models named hireEZ first on the direct prompt; one named Loxo. hireEZ was named by ten of the fourteen models and Loxo by eleven and hireEZ carries 16 labels and Loxo 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the talent intelligence page.
By framing
hireEZFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLoxo
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
hireEZ Loxo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, hireEZ on the left and Loxo on the right.The direct prompt
hireEZ first, Loxo not the choice
2 of 14 modelsLoxo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Loxo first, hireEZ not the choice
1 of 14 modelshireEZ was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
hireEZ6%#5 of 15Loxo4%#6 of 15What the models said about hireEZ
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Reported concerns include variable contact-data quality, unclear external-data sources, and costs that rise with scale.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Unlike traditional platforms like SeekOut or hireEZ (which often start around $13,000–$20,000 annually)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Starts around $169/user/month... but it edges toward mid-budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
What the models said about Loxo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Weak "opt‑out" synchronization and data‑management controls... Aggressive sourcing that can scrape personal contact information without consent.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Powerful but "quite expensive" per G2 reviews, challenging for small businesses” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Loxo stands out as the best talent intelligence platform for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“best value pick is usually Loxo” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.