Goals and OKRs · November 2026 Edition
Leapsome vs OKRs Tool
One of fourteen models named Leapsome first on the direct prompt; zero named OKRs Tool. Leapsome was named by twelve of the fourteen models and OKRs Tool by thirteen and Leapsome carries 23 labels and OKRs Tool 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seventeen categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2320A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Leapsome reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Tability vs Leapsome · Tability vs OKRs Tool · Profit.co vs Leapsome
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LeapsomeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOKRs Tool
Direct10
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained02
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Leapsome · 2 against OKRs Tool
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Leapsome and OKRs Tool stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Leapsome OKRs Tool first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Leapsome on the left and OKRs Tool on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Leapsome and OKRs Tool stood in it.
Leapsome first, OKRs Tool not the choice
1 of 14 modelsOKRs Tool was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Leapsome, Tability alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Lattice
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniBetterworks alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Perdoo, WorkBoard
Gemini 3.5 FlashProfit.co alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
Grok 4.20Tability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome
Mistral SmallTability alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome
Muse Glimmer 30BTability alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
Perplexity SonarCascade Strategy alternatives: Perdoo, Tability
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Tability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: 15Five, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo alternatives: Betterworks, Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
OKRs Tool leads by eight points.
OKRs Tool12%#5 of 20Leapsome3%#8 of 20Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Leapsome4%#5 of 17OKRs Tool4%#6 of 17Enterprise
OKRs Tool leads by eighteen points.
OKRs Tool18%#2 of 11Leapsome0%#– of 11What the models said about Leapsome
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“or Leapsome if you prefer combining OKRs with performance management. Both offer the scalability, reasonable pricing, and quick implementation” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about OKRs Tool
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Users face a steep learning curve with OKRsTool, making it challenging to manage and utilize effectively.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve, one-way integrations, 24-hour sync delays” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best OKR software for a company with a limited budget is OKRs Tool, which offers a flat-rate pricing plan of $30/month” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best free/cheapest: OKRsTool or Synergita Starter.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need to pay but want predictable costs, OKRs Tool's $49/month flat rate is hard to beat.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Tability vs LeapsomeTability vs OKRs ToolProfit.co vs LeapsomeProfit.co vs OKRs ToolPerdoo vs LeapsomePerdoo vs OKRs ToolLattice vs LeapsomeLattice vs OKRs ToolLeapsome vs MooncampLeapsome vs TeamflectOKRs Tool vs MooncampOKRs Tool vs TeamflectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.