Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Performance and talent management › 360 feedback › Teamflect vs 15Five
360 feedback · November 2026 Edition

Teamflect vs 15Five

Zero of fourteen models named Teamflect first on the direct prompt; zero named 15Five. Teamflect was named by ten of the fourteen models and 15Five by fourteen and Teamflect carries 16 labels and 15Five 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Teamflect

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

15Five

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share3%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels1640A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamflect reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lattice was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs Teamflect · Lattice vs 15Five · Spidergap vs Teamflect

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the 360 feedback page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamflectFirst choices, of fourteen models15Five
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained204 against 15Five
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against 15Five
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teamflect and 15Five stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Teamflect 15Five first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamflect on the left and 15Five on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamflect and 15Five stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, People Element, Primalogik, Spidergap
Qwen 3.7 FlashLattice alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp
Kimi K2Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Spidergap
GPT-6 LunaLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCulture Amp alternatives: CR360, EchoSpan, HiBob
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, Spidergap
Perplexity SonarLattice alternatives: Leapsome, Questback, Small Improvements, Spidergap
Grok 4.20Lattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, Spidergap
Mistral SmallSpidergap alternatives: FeedbackPulse, Lattice, Synergita Perform
DeepSeek V4 FlashLattice, Spidergap alternatives: Culture Amp
Llama 4 MaverickSpidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, Lattice
GLM 4.7 FlashXSpidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice
MiniMax M2.5Spidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, Leapsome
Muse Glimmer 30BSpidergap alternatives: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teamflect leads by two points.
Teamflect2%#9 of 14
15Five0%#10 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Teamflect leads by two points.
Teamflect3%#7 of 18
15Five2%#8 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Teamflect0%#– of 11
15Five0%#10 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Teamflect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Teamflect is the most frequently cited "value for money" free option for small business.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about 15Five

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Avoid enterprise tools like Lattice, 15Five, or Culture Amp” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
Also compared
Lattice vs TeamflectLattice vs 15FiveSpidergap vs TeamflectSpidergap vs 15FiveCulture Amp vs TeamflectCulture Amp vs 15FiveEffy AI vs TeamflectEffy AI vs 15FiveFeedbackPulse vs TeamflectFeedbackPulse vs 15FiveLeapsome vs TeamflectLeapsome vs 15FiveAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full 360 feedback standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.