Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Performance and talent management › 360 feedback › FeedbackPulse vs 15Five
360 feedback · November 2026 Edition

FeedbackPulse vs 15Five

Zero of fourteen models named FeedbackPulse first on the direct prompt; zero named 15Five. FeedbackPulse was named by eleven of the fourteen models and 15Five by fourteen and FeedbackPulse carries 18 labels and 15Five 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.

FeedbackPulse

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

15Five

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels1840A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FeedbackPulse reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lattice was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs FeedbackPulse · Lattice vs 15Five · Spidergap vs FeedbackPulse

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the 360 feedback page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FeedbackPulseFirst choices, of fourteen models15Five
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained404 against 15Five
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against 15Five
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where FeedbackPulse and 15Five stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
FeedbackPulse 15Five first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FeedbackPulse on the left and 15Five on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FeedbackPulse and 15Five stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, People Element, Primalogik, Spidergap
Mistral SmallSpidergap alternatives: FeedbackPulse, Lattice, Synergita Perform
Qwen 3.7 FlashLattice alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp
Kimi K2Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Spidergap
GPT-6 LunaLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCulture Amp alternatives: CR360, EchoSpan, HiBob
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, Spidergap
Perplexity SonarLattice alternatives: Leapsome, Questback, Small Improvements, Spidergap
Grok 4.20Lattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, Spidergap
DeepSeek V4 FlashLattice, Spidergap alternatives: Culture Amp
Llama 4 MaverickSpidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, Lattice
GLM 4.7 FlashXSpidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice
MiniMax M2.5Spidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, Leapsome
Muse Glimmer 30BSpidergap alternatives: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
FeedbackPulse leads by sixteen points.
FeedbackPulse16%#2 of 14
15Five0%#10 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
FeedbackPulse leads by five points.
FeedbackPulse7%#5 of 18
15Five2%#8 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
FeedbackPulse0%#– of 11
15Five0%#10 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about FeedbackPulse

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with FeedbackPulse (free tier) if you have fewer than 10 employees.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Teamflect (if you use Microsoft Teams) or FeedbackPulse” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“FeedbackPulse is the strongest overall choice” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about 15Five

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Avoid enterprise tools like Lattice, 15Five, or Culture Amp” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
Also compared
Lattice vs FeedbackPulseLattice vs 15FiveSpidergap vs FeedbackPulseSpidergap vs 15FiveCulture Amp vs FeedbackPulseCulture Amp vs 15FiveEffy AI vs FeedbackPulseEffy AI vs 15FiveFeedbackPulse vs LeapsomeFeedbackPulse vs TeamflectLeapsome vs 15FiveTeamflect vs 15FiveAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full 360 feedback standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.