Seven of fourteen models named Uncommon Giving first on the direct prompt; zero named Groundswell. Uncommon Giving was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Groundswell by twelve and Uncommon Giving carries 42 labels and Groundswell 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee giving and volunteering page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Uncommon Giving and Groundswell were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 99 answers naming Uncommon Giving and the 88 naming Groundswell. In those answers Groundswell took the first choice one time and Uncommon Giving eleven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Higher fixed cost than basic tools” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best employee giving and volunteering platform for a company with a limited budget is Uncommon Giving, which starts at $5,000 a year with no implementation fee.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Submittable or Uncommon Giving as they offer the best combination of functionality, ease of use, and mid-market appropriate pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B organizations, Uncommon Giving is currently the top recommendation due to its rapid deployment and cost-efficiency.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“These may be unsuitable where native nonprofit-CRM integration or federated/community-campaign support is essential” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“starts at $12,500/year, so it's less likely to fit a tight budget” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Groundswell and Millie — ask what screening they use now.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Smart, lightweight platforms (Uncommon Giving, Groundswell, momoGood) may outperform the more heavyweight enterprise options” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“lean toward modern, high-agility CSR tools (such as *Deed*, *Groundswell*, *Percent Pledge*, or *Uncommon Giving*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Platforms like YourCause and Groundswell specifically target 500-1,000 employee companies” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.