Index › HR › Onboarding and employee experience › Employee engagement surv › Leapsome vs ThriveSparrow Engage
Employee engagement surveys · November 2026 Edition
Leapsome vs ThriveSparrow Engage
One of fourteen models named Leapsome first on the direct prompt; zero named ThriveSparrow Engage. Leapsome was named by twelve of the fourteen models and ThriveSparrow Engage by ten and Leapsome carries 21 labels and ThriveSparrow Engage 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seventeen categories this edition.
ThriveSparrow Engage
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2117A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Leapsome reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.15Five Engage was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. 15Five Engage vs Leapsome · 15Five Engage vs ThriveSparrow Engage · Culture Amp vs Leapsome
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee engagement surveys page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LeapsomeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsThriveSparrow EngageDirect101 against ThriveSparrow Engage
Paraphrase001 against Leapsome
Comparative00
Budget-constrained112 against Leapsome
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Leapsome and ThriveSparrow Engage stood in it.
| Model | DirectTE | ParaphraseTE | ComparativeTE | Budget-constrainedTE | Scale-constrainedTE | NegativeTE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | TE | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | TE | TE | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | TE | TE | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | TE | TE | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | TE | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | TE | TE | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | TE | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | TE | TE | TE |
LeapsomeTE ThriveSparrow Engage first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Leapsome on the left and ThriveSparrow Engage on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Leapsome and ThriveSparrow Engage stood in it.
Leapsome first, ThriveSparrow Engage not the choice
1 of 14 modelsThriveSparrow Engage was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral Small15Five Engage, Leapsome, Workleap Officevibe alternatives: Lattice Engagement
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice Engagement alternatives: 15Five Engage, Culture Amp, Leapsome, Workleap Officevibe
Grok 4.2015Five Engage alternatives: Leapsome, Workleap Officevibe
DeepSeek V4 Flash15Five Engage alternatives: Leapsome, Workleap Officevibe
Qwen 3.7 Flash15Five Engage alternatives: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement, Leapsome
Kimi K215Five Engage alternatives: Leapsome
GLM 4.7 FlashX15Five Engage alternatives: Leapsome, Workleap Officevibe
MiniMax M2.515Five Engage alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, Workleap Officevibe
Muse Glimmer 30B15Five Engage alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, ThriveSparrow Engage, Workleap Officevibe
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Culture Amp alternatives: 15Five Engage, Lattice Engagement, Quantum Workplace, WorkTango
GPT-5.4 miniCulture Amp alternatives: Betterworks, Lattice Engagement, Workvivo
Perplexity SonarCulture Amp alternatives: 15Five Engage, Lattice Engagement, Workleap Officevibe
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GPT-6 LunaCulture Amp alternatives: 15Five Engage, Lattice Engagement, Workleap Officevibe
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ThriveSparrow Engage leads by fourteen points.
ThriveSparrow Engage14%#3 of 11
Leapsome0%#10 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Leapsome leads at mid-market.
Leapsome4%#5 of 10ThriveSparrow Engage2%#6 of 10
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Leapsome0%#– of 7ThriveSparrow Engage0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →What the models said about Leapsome
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Avoid for Tight Budgets: ... or Leapsome” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
What the models said about ThriveSparrow Engage
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Niche for mid-market with neuroscience/AI focus; good for frontline/growing B2B but less established.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Best HR Features per Dollar | Workleap (Officevibe) or ThriveSparrow” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for SMB and mid-market teams that want low per-employee pricing and reach deskless employees: ThriveSparrow Engage starts at $3 per employee/month” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Cheapest Dedicated Option ... Specifically designed for growing and frontline teams at a very low cost per employee.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
15Five Engage vs Leapsome15Five Engage vs ThriveSparrow EngageCulture Amp vs LeapsomeCulture Amp vs ThriveSparrow EngageWorkleap Officevibe vs LeapsomeWorkleap Officevibe vs ThriveSparrow EngageLattice Engagement vs LeapsomeLattice Engagement vs ThriveSparrow EngageLeapsome vs Google FormsThriveSparrow Engage vs Google FormsAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full employee engagement surv standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.