Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › GTM › Products › Stark · November 2026 Edition

Website governance and accessibility · Named, not ranked

Stark

getstark.co ↗

–Too few to rank

3/14Models named it

0First choices

1Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inWebsite governance and accessibility #37 mid-market

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Stark has 2.

Why models recommend it

“Best for: UI/UX design and product teams.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative

What gives them pause

No model argued against it.

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Stark, over the 5 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
Siteimprove	5	4	View →
Level Access Accessibility Platform	5	2	View →
Silktide Governance	4	2	View →
AudioEye	4	1	View →
Crownpeak Digital Quality Management	4	0	View →
accessiBe	4	0	View →
Acquia Web Governance	3	0	View →
Deque axe Platform	3	0	View →
UserWay	3	0	View →
DubBot	2	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Stark came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Stark and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com5

accessibilitycloud.com4

barrierbreak.com4

guideflow.com3

levelaccess.com3

silktide.com3

testparty.ai3

accessibilitychecker.com2

accessible.org2

getstark.coIts own site2

Twenty-nine of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Stark came from a third party's page.

Pages cited

accessibilitycloud.com/the-digital-accessibility-platform-landscape-16-platforms-reviewed4

barrierbreak.com/accessibility-governance-platform4

g2.com/categories/Digital-accessibility-platforms3

levelaccess.com/blog/how-to-choose-an-enterprise-accessibility-platform3

testparty.ai/blog/enterprise-accessibility-platform3

guideflow.com/blog/digital-accessibility-software2

silktide.com/blog/best-web-governance-platforms2

verifiedmarketresearch.com/blog/best-digital-accessibility-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Stark across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0