Moz Local
Gane, the publisher, sells software in SEO, where this product is measured. It is measured there by the same method as every other product. How the conflict is handled.
Strongest at small business. Ranked 43 of 43 for enterprise buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
BrightLocal is first at 45%.
BrightLocal is first at 46%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Yext is first at 52%.
Why models recommend it
“The best local listings management platform for a company with a limited budget is Moz Local, as it is the most affordable option”Llama 4 Maverick · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Moz Local is best for affordable automated listing distribution, offering the best entry price with solid core features.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“For a single-location company on a tight budget, Moz Local at $16/month is the sweet spot”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Moz Local is usually the best starting point for a local listings management platform”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Why to avoid: - Email overload — Users report excessive, unmanageable notifications”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Negative question · warning
“Who should avoid: Agencies, enterprises, or anyone needing fast syncing/automation.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Other platforms like BrightLocal and Moz Local have also received some negative feedback, but they also offer useful features”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“more cost-effective, but usually better for smaller footprints or simpler needs than a typical mid-market B2B rollout”GPT-5.4 mini · Direct question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Moz Local, over the 141 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 123 | 34 | Compare → | |
| 117 | 21 | Compare → | |
| 82 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 75 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 72 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 48 | 1 | View → | |
| 36 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 29 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 22 | 2 | View → | |
| 21 | 8 | View → |
What the models named instead of Moz Local →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 127 of the 141 answers that named Moz Local and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for Moz Local, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |