Minoa vs Cuvama
Two of fourteen models named Minoa first on the direct prompt; zero named Cuvama. Minoa was named by eight of the fourteen models and Cuvama by thirteen and Minoa carries 21 labels and Cuvama 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the value selling tools page.
By framing
MinoaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCuvama
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Minoa and Cuvama were named in the same answer twenty-three times, of the 42 answers naming Minoa and the 71 naming Cuvama. In those answers Cuvama took the first choice zero times and Minoa zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Minoa Cuvama first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Minoa on the left and Cuvama on the right.The direct prompt
Minoa first, Cuvama not the choice
2 of 14 modelsCuvama was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Cuvama6%#4 of 13Minoa2%#8 of 13What the models said about Minoa
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Minoa | $9,600+/year | Too costly for limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Newer player—evaluate maturity for your specific use case” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“For rep-assisted enterprise/mid-market business cases: Look into Minoa or The ROI Shop.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Sales-Led Mid-Market Deals: Minoa or The ROI Shop” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Minoa is the AI-recommended first choice for mid-market” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cuvama
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“graduate to Symbe or Cuvama for more sophisticated business case building” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“The market leaders in this space right now are Mediafly, Cuvama, and ValueNavigator (ROI Selling)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“or Cuvama (due to its modern AI-native approach to discovery)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Overall Best Fit for Mid-Sized B2B: Cuvama” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.