Index › GTM › Sales › RFP response › 1up vs Proposify
RFP response software · November 2026 Edition

1up vs Proposify

Zero of fourteen models named 1up first on the direct prompt; zero named Proposify. 1up was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Proposify by thirteen and 1up carries 21 labels and Proposify 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

1up

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Proposify

criticized challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2127A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 1up reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Loopio was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Loopio vs 1up · Loopio vs Proposify · PandaDoc vs 1up

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the RFP response software page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
1upFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProposify
Direct001 against Proposify
Paraphrase01
Comparative002 against Proposify
Budget-constrained40
Scale-constrained00
Negative105 against Proposify
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where 1up and Proposify stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
1up Proposify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 1up on the left and Proposify on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 1up and Proposify stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20Loopio alternatives: PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Loopio, Steerlab alternatives: AutoRFP.ai, SiftHub
GPT-5.4 miniLoopio alternatives: Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Gemini 3.5 FlashLoopio alternatives: AutoRFP.ai, Inventive AI, QorusDocs, Responsive
Perplexity SonarLoopio alternatives: RequestFX, Responsive, Steerlab
Mistral SmallLoopio alternatives: Responsive, Upland Qvidian
DeepSeek V4 FlashLoopio, Responsive alternatives: PandaDoc
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashLoopio alternatives: CQ Core, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Kimi K2Loopio, Responsive alternatives: PandaDoc
GLM 4.7 FlashXLoopio, Responsive alternatives: Better Proposals, eBuyerAssist Platform
MiniMax M2.5Responsive alternatives: Loopio, PandaDoc
GPT-6 LunaLoopio alternatives: Responsive
Muse Glimmer 30BLoopio, Responsive alternatives: Upland Qvidian

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
1up leads by seventeen points.
1up17%#2 of 12
Proposify0%#10 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
1up leads by six points.
1up7%#4 of 11
Proposify2%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
1up0%#9 of 10
Proposify0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 1up

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Offers a free plan and a 14-day trial, making it a great choice for budget-conscious teams... ranked as the top RFP response software in 2026 for value for money” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Stick to tools specifically designed for RFP workflows, such as Loopio, Qvidian, or Arphie/1up” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“1up if you want a completely free option to start” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Proposify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Tools like Proposify and PandaDoc are primarily designed for general proposal creation and lack the specialized features required for RFP response management” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“These are primarily sales proposal tools and are not designed for the specific workflows and compliance needs of RFP responses.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“1. Proposify (Most Popular for Mid-Market)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.