Nine of fourteen models named Calendly first on the direct prompt; zero named HubSpot Meetings. Both were named by all fourteen models and Calendly carries 79 labels and HubSpot Meetings 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.
United States, founded 2013. Named in three categories this edition.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the meeting scheduling page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Calendly and HubSpot Meetings were named in the same answer 136 times, of the 232 answers naming Calendly and the 139 naming HubSpot Meetings. In those answers HubSpot Meetings took the first choice eighteen times and Calendly seventy-eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“specifically avoid putting PHI or highly confidential information into tools like Calendly that explicitly prohibit it” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently flagged in privacy lists (e.g., Awesome Privacy recommends avoiding it)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“A 2025 study of Zoom apps flagged the *Calendly for Zoom* integration as requesting access to meeting content that appeared unnecessary for its scheduling function.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best meeting scheduling tool for sales teams on a limited budget is Calendly, which offers a free plan and paid plans starting at $10/seat/mo.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Calendly is arguably the most popular standalone scheduling tool... Best balance of features, price, and ease of use for most people.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Calendly is the best overall pick for most sales teams because it balances CRM integration, round robin routing, and ease of setup.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Heavy visitor tracking and data harvesting... inappropriate for personal use” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you're already using HubSpot CRM, HubSpot Meetings is likely the best fit due to its deep integration and free tier.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“For a sales team with a very limited budget, I'd strongly recommend starting with HubSpot Meetings (free).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“HubSpot Meetings (free tier) is the best overall choice for sales teams on a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.