Index › GTM › Sales › Scheduling › Calendly vs Cal.com
Meeting scheduling · November 2026 Edition

Calendly vs Cal.com

Nine of fourteen models named Calendly first on the direct prompt; zero named Cal.com. Both were named by all fourteen models and Calendly carries 79 labels and Cal.com 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Calendly

endorsed leader

United States, founded 2013. Named in three categories this edition.

Cal.com

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share56%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels7940A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Calendly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Chili Piper was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Calendly vs HubSpot Meetings · Calendly vs Chili Piper · Calendly vs RevenueHero

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the meeting scheduling page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CalendlyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCal.com
Direct90
Paraphrase130
Comparative121
Budget-constrained321 against Calendly
Scale-constrained30
Negative138 against Calendly · 3 against Cal.com
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Calendly and Cal.com were named in the same answer 122 times, of the 232 answers naming Calendly and the 138 naming Cal.com. In those answers Cal.com took the first choice fourteen times and Calendly seventy-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Calendly and Cal.com stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Calendly Cal.com first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Calendly on the left and Cal.com on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Calendly and Cal.com stood in it.

Calendly first, Cal.com an alternative

9 of 14 modelsCal.com was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Calendly alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Meetings, RevenueHero
Grok 4.20Calendly alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Sales Hub, OnceHub, SavvyCal
Mistral SmallCalendly, Chili Piper alternatives: HubSpot Meetings
DeepSeek V4 FlashCalendly, RevenueHero alternatives: Cal.com, HubSpot Sales Hub
Qwen 3.7 FlashCalendly, Chili Piper alternatives: HubSpot Meetings, Salesforce Scheduler
GLM 4.7 FlashXCalendly alternatives: Cal.com, Chili Piper, HubSpot Sales Hub
MiniMax M2.5Calendly alternatives: Cal.com, Chili Piper, HubSpot Meetings
GPT-6 LunaCalendly alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Meetings
Muse Glimmer 30BCalendly alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Meetings

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniChili Piper alternatives: Calendly, HubSpot Sales Hub
Gemini 3.5 FlashChili Piper alternatives: Calendly, HubSpot Meetings, RevenueHero
Perplexity SonarChili Piper alternatives: Cal.com, Calendly, HubSpot Meetings, LeadAngel
Kimi K2RevenueHero alternatives: Calendly, HubSpot Meetings

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Calendly leads by sixty-two points.
Calendly66%#1 of 12
Cal.com4%#4 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Calendly leads by fifty-two points.
Calendly56%#1 of 11
Cal.com4%#4 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Calendly leads by forty-six points.
Calendly54%#1 of 8
Cal.com7%#3 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Calendly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“specifically avoid putting PHI or highly confidential information into tools like Calendly that explicitly prohibit it” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently flagged in privacy lists (e.g., Awesome Privacy recommends avoiding it)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“A 2025 study of Zoom apps flagged the *Calendly for Zoom* integration as requesting access to meeting content that appeared unnecessary for its scheduling function.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best meeting scheduling tool for sales teams on a limited budget is Calendly, which offers a free plan and paid plans starting at $10/seat/mo.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Calendly is arguably the most popular standalone scheduling tool... Best balance of features, price, and ease of use for most people.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Calendly is the best overall pick for most sales teams because it balances CRM integration, round robin routing, and ease of setup.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Cal.com

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.

“Included in "avoid" lists alongside Calendly and Doodle on privacy sites” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools such as Cal.com can provide control and customization, but self-hosting leaves your team responsible for uptime, security patches, backups, and scaling.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“the recent broken access control history means you should verify patch status, version, and access controls before using it for sensitive data” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cal.com is the strongest starting point among Calendly alternatives for free solo booking and affordable team routing” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“tools like Cal.com (open-source, self-hosting available) ... offer stronger privacy-by-design architectures” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“High-rated options balancing privacy and functionality include Cal.com (open-source)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.