Meeting scheduling · November 2026 Edition
Cal.com vs RevenueHero
Zero of fourteen models named Cal.com first on the direct prompt; two named RevenueHero. Cal.com was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and RevenueHero by six and Cal.com carries 40 labels and RevenueHero 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4010A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cal.com reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Calendly was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Calendly vs Cal.com · Calendly vs RevenueHero · HubSpot Meetings vs Cal.com
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the meeting scheduling page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Cal.comFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRevenueHero
Direct02
Paraphrase00
Comparative10
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained00
Negative303 against Cal.com
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cal.com and RevenueHero stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Cal.com RevenueHero first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cal.com on the left and RevenueHero on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cal.com and RevenueHero stood in it.
RevenueHero first, Cal.com an alternative
2 of 14 modelsCal.com was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashCalendly, RevenueHero alternatives: Cal.com, HubSpot Sales Hub
Kimi K2RevenueHero alternatives: Calendly, HubSpot Meetings
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Calendly alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Meetings, RevenueHero
Gemini 3.5 FlashChili Piper alternatives: Calendly, HubSpot Meetings, RevenueHero
Perplexity SonarChili Piper alternatives: Cal.com, Calendly, HubSpot Meetings, LeadAngel
GLM 4.7 FlashXCalendly alternatives: Cal.com, Chili Piper, HubSpot Sales Hub
MiniMax M2.5Calendly alternatives: Cal.com, Chili Piper, HubSpot Meetings
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniChili Piper alternatives: Calendly, HubSpot Sales Hub
Grok 4.20Calendly alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Sales Hub, OnceHub, SavvyCal
Mistral SmallCalendly, Chili Piper alternatives: HubSpot Meetings
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashCalendly, Chili Piper alternatives: HubSpot Meetings, Salesforce Scheduler
GPT-6 LunaCalendly alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Meetings
Muse Glimmer 30BCalendly alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Meetings
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cal.com leads by four points.
Cal.com4%#4 of 12RevenueHero0%#11 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Cal.com4%#4 of 11RevenueHero4%#5 of 11Enterprise
What the models said about Cal.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Included in "avoid" lists alongside Calendly and Doodle on privacy sites” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools such as Cal.com can provide control and customization, but self-hosting leaves your team responsible for uptime, security patches, backups, and scaling.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“the recent broken access control history means you should verify patch status, version, and access controls before using it for sensitive data” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cal.com is the strongest starting point among Calendly alternatives for free solo booking and affordable team routing” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“tools like Cal.com (open-source, self-hosting available) ... offer stronger privacy-by-design architectures” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“High-rated options balancing privacy and functionality include Cal.com (open-source)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
What the models said about RevenueHero
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“If you have to pick just one, RevenueHero offers the best blend of routing, CRM integration, speed-to-lead, and mid-market-friendly pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“RevenueHero — Best Overall for Mid-Market” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.