Three of fourteen models named Dock first on the direct prompt; zero named GetAccept. Both were named by all fourteen models and Dock carries 50 labels and GetAccept 57, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2021. Named in eight categories this edition.
founded 2015. Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital sales rooms page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Dock and GetAccept were named in the same answer 104 times, of the 281 answers naming Dock and the 242 naming GetAccept. In those answers GetAccept took the first choice four times and Dock twenty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“I'd skip Dock if keeping ongoing costs very low is the priority: its free plan doesn't include seats” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · hard negative
“Dock lacks the depth needed for complex, multi-stakeholder enterprise sales processes” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms like Accord or Dock can charge platform base fees (e.g., $350+/mo) on top of per-user seats, making them costly for small teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Dock – Currently the top choice, leading in buyer engagement and deal room functionality for mid-market B2B companies.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: Dock for a mid-sized B2B company that wants a buyer-facing deal room” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mid-market, need sales→onboarding continuity → Dock (flat-rate, reusable workspaces)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“GetAccept has poor user satisfaction, with a Trustpilot rating of 1.7/5 and reports of "platform filled with bugs and usability problems"” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Skip larger platforms like Seismic or GetAccept unless you already have other enablement needs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Do not buy these if you need a place for a buyer to interact with multiple stakeholders” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“I'd generally recommend GetAccept if your priority is a true buyer engagement + deal room tool” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the recommended buyer engagement and deal room tool for a mid-sized B2B company is GetAccept” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“GetAccept is the best Digital Sales Room for B2B sales teams with complex sales processes” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.