CRM data quality and deduplication · November 2026 Edition
Insycle vs Cleanlist
Eleven of fourteen models named Insycle first on the direct prompt; two named Cleanlist. Insycle was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cleanlist by eight and Insycle carries 58 labels and Cleanlist 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share50%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5811A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Insycle reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.DemandTools was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Insycle vs Dedupely · Insycle vs DemandTools · Insycle vs ZoomInfo Operations
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CRM data quality and deduplication page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
InsycleFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCleanlist
Direct112
Paraphrase100
Comparative30
Budget-constrained201 against Insycle
Scale-constrained10
Negative101 against Insycle
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Insycle and Cleanlist stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Insycle Cleanlist first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Insycle on the left and Cleanlist on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Insycle and Cleanlist stood in it.
Insycle first, Cleanlist an alternative
11 of 14 modelsCleanlist was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniInsycle alternatives: Cloudingo, DemandTools, HubSpot Operations Hub
Gemini 3.5 FlashInsycle alternatives: Clay, DataGroomr, Dedupely, Validity
Perplexity SonarInsycle alternatives: Cloudingo, DemandTools, Openprise, Tofu, ZoomInfo OperationsOS
Grok 4.20Insycle alternatives: Dedupely, DemandTools
Mistral SmallInsycle
DeepSeek V4 FlashInsycle alternatives: Cloudingo, Dedupely, DemandTools
Kimi K2Insycle alternatives: Cloudingo, Dedupely, DemandTools
GLM 4.7 FlashXInsycle alternatives: Cleanlist, Cloudingo, Dedupely, DemandTools
MiniMax M2.5Insycle alternatives: Cleanlist, Cloudingo, Dedupely
GPT-6 LunaInsycle alternatives: Cloudingo, DemandTools
Muse Glimmer 30BInsycle alternatives: Dedupely, DemandTools
Cleanlist first, Insycle an alternative
2 of 14 modelsInsycle was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickCleanlist alternatives: Dedupely, DemandTools, Findymail CRM Datacare, Insycle
Qwen 3.7 FlashCleanlist alternatives: Clay, Dedupely, DemandTools, Insycle
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5DemandTools alternatives: Cloudingo, Dedupely, Insycle, LeadAngel, ZoomInfo Operations
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Insycle leads by fifty-one points.
Insycle51%#1 of 11Cleanlist0%#– of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Insycle leads by forty-six points.
Insycle50%#1 of 13Cleanlist4%#4 of 13Enterprise
Cleanlist is not named for this buyer.
Insycle17%#2 of 11Cleanlist—not namedWhat the models said about Insycle
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“High cost for large accounts — Pricing scales poorly; users report it becomes very expensive” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“rather than enterprise tools like DemandTools or Insycle” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Insycle is a mature, rules-based tool for HubSpot and Salesforce data quality (dedupe, standardize, bulk operations).” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Insycle stands out as the best overall CRM data quality and deduplication tool for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“the recommended CRM data cleansing tool for a mid-sized B2B company is Insycle, as it is the clear leader” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cleanlist
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“The best CRM data quality and deduplication tool for a mid-market B2B company is Cleanlist” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Verdict: Best Overall for Mid-Market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“If you already use Cleanlist for enrichment and want bundled hygiene, Cleanlist AI simplifies your stack.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Insycle vs DedupelyInsycle vs DemandToolsInsycle vs ZoomInfo OperationsInsycle vs ZoomInfoInsycle vs OpenRefineDedupely vs CleanlistDemandTools vs CleanlistCleanlist vs ZoomInfo OperationsCleanlist vs ZoomInfoCleanlist vs OpenRefineAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full CRM data quality standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.