Referral Rock vs Ambassador
Six of fourteen models named Referral Rock first on the direct prompt; one named Ambassador. Referral Rock was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Ambassador by eleven and Referral Rock carries 42 labels and Ambassador 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the referral and partner programs page.
By framing
Referral RockFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAmbassador
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Referral Rock and Ambassador were named in the same answer sixty times, of the 228 answers naming Referral Rock and the 108 naming Ambassador. In those answers Ambassador took the first choice nine times and Referral Rock fourteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Referral Rock Ambassador first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Referral Rock on the left and Ambassador on the right.The direct prompt
Referral Rock first, Ambassador an alternative
6 of 14 modelsAmbassador was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Ambassador first, Referral Rock not the choice
1 of 14 modelsReferral Rock was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Referral Rock24%#1 of 9Ambassador0%#– of 9Referral Rock12%#2 of 13Ambassador2%#8 of 13Ambassador16%#1 of 14Referral Rock9%#6 of 14What the models said about Referral Rock
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“G2 reviews highlight a steep learning curve, clunky UI, integration issues... can be frustrating for complex programs” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Referral Rock starts at $250/month, which may be steep for a tight budget.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“pricing for Referral Rock starts at $200 per month for its Starter plan” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Referral Rock serves mid-market companies wanting customizable referral programs without enterprise complexity.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Ambassador
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Ambassador (lock-in/pricing practices)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“often seen as more complex/expensive and scores lower on ease-of-use compared to Referral Factory” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Ambassador or Referral Factory would be the strongest choices” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.