Index › GTM › Marketing › Paid ads › Adzooma vs Adalysis
Search and social advertising platforms · November 2026 Edition

Adzooma vs Adalysis

Zero of fourteen models named Adzooma first on the direct prompt; zero named Adalysis. Adzooma was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Adalysis by eleven and both carry 20 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

Adzooma

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Adalysis

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels2020Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Adzooma reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Optmyzr vs Adzooma · Optmyzr vs Adalysis · Google Ads vs Adzooma

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the search and social advertising platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AdzoomaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAdalysis
Direct00
Paraphrase21
Comparative00
Budget-constrained40
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against Adzooma
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Adzooma and Adalysis stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Adzooma Adalysis first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Adzooma on the left and Adalysis on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Adzooma and Adalysis stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20HubSpot Ads alternatives: AdRoll, Adalysis, Google Ads, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, Optmyzr
Kimi K2Metadata.io alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Adalysis, Madgicx, Optmyzr
Muse Glimmer 30BGoogle Ads, LinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: ActiveCampaign, Adzooma, HubSpot Ads, Marin Software, Optmyzr, Skai

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Ads, Metadata.io alternatives: Google Ads, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, Marin Software
GPT-5.4 miniSkai alternatives: Adobe Advertising, Google Search Ads 360, Smartly
Gemini 3.5 FlashMetadata.io alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Demandbase, Optmyzr
Perplexity SonarHubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: 6sense, Demandbase, Google Ads, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, Metadata.io, Microsoft Advertising
Mistral SmallStackAdapt alternatives: Demandbase, Google Ads, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, Smartly
DeepSeek V4 FlashAdRoll ABM alternatives: Madgicx, Optmyzr
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashOptmyzr alternatives: Demandbase, Marin Software, StackAdapt
GLM 4.7 FlashXHubSpot Ads alternatives: AdEspresso, Marin Software
MiniMax M2.5Metadata.io alternatives: 6sense, AdRoll ABM, Demandbase, HubSpot Ads
GPT-6 LunaOptmyzr alternatives: HubSpot Ads, Skai

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Adzooma leads by eleven points.
Adzooma11%#5 of 14
Adalysis0%#– of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Adzooma leads by seven points.
Adzooma11%#4 of 18
Adalysis4%#8 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Adzooma0%#– of 10
Adalysis0%#10 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Adzooma

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“TrustPilot rating: 3.1/5 — with specific "SCAM" accusations” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Adzooma stands out as the best overall paid search and social ads management platform for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Practical pick: start with Adzooma for a unified Google/Microsoft/Meta view and quick wins on budget and performance” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you have $0 for software: Use Adzooma's free tier for cross-platform monitoring” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Adalysis

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Optmyzr / Adalysis: Best-in-class for Paid Search optimization and rule-building.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Optmyzr and Adalysis are the best self-serve options” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Optmyzr or Adalysis are excellent choices if your primary spend is on Google/Microsoft Ads” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.