Radar vs GroundTruth
Two of fourteen models named Radar first on the direct prompt; one named GroundTruth. Radar was named by twelve of the fourteen models and GroundTruth by nine and Radar carries 31 labels and GroundTruth 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
New York City, United States, founded 2016. Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the retail, proximity and iot marketing page.
By framing
RadarFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGroundTruth
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Radar and GroundTruth were named in the same answer forty-three times, of the 120 answers naming Radar and the 55 naming GroundTruth. In those answers GroundTruth took the first choice three times and Radar nineteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Radar GroundTruth first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Radar on the left and GroundTruth on the right.The direct prompt
Radar first, GroundTruth an alternative
2 of 14 modelsGroundTruth was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GroundTruth first, Radar an alternative
1 of 14 modelsRadar was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Radar29%#1 of 10GroundTruth4%#3 of 10Radar4%#3 of 10GroundTruth4%#4 of 10Radar21%#1 of 10GroundTruth0%#7 of 10What the models said about Radar
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Radar is a proximity marketing platform that some reviewers advise to avoid, citing its high cost ($500+/mo) and enterprise-grade pricing.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Use standard location SDKs (e.g., Radar, Bluedot, or native iOS/Android location APIs) inside your own brand's app” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Radar if a development team needs flexible geofencing, visit detection, and location APIs.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Foursquare and Radar lead in analytics and attribution, with Radar in developer flexibility.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about GroundTruth
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“GroundTruth as contested among small-business recommendations; that is a signal to run stronger procurement checks” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“GroundTruth is a good choice for limited budgets, offering mobile/desktop campaign budgets as low as $500” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Foursquare and GroundTruth are the top recommendations due to their comprehensive features” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Axiobench runner-up 8.9/10: “Proximity-to-footfall measurement that combines on-site behavior with exposure-driven campaign reporting in one workflow.”” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.