Print · November 2026 Edition
Postalytics vs PostGrid Print & Mail
Nine of fourteen models named Postalytics first on the direct prompt; two named PostGrid Print & Mail. Both were named by all fourteen models and Postalytics carries 57 labels and PostGrid Print & Mail 58, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share40%18%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%16%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5758A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Postalytics reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lob was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Postalytics vs Click2Mail · Postalytics vs Sendoso · Postalytics vs Lob
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the print page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PostalyticsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPostGrid Print & Mail
Direct92
Paraphrase65
Comparative33
Budget-constrained42
Scale-constrained10
Negative003 against Postalytics · 9 against PostGrid Print & Mail
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Postalytics and PostGrid Print & Mail were named in the same answer 114 times, of the 168 answers naming Postalytics and the 202 naming PostGrid Print & Mail. In those answers PostGrid Print & Mail took the first choice nineteen times and Postalytics thirty-seven.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Postalytics and PostGrid Print & Mail stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | ||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Postalytics PostGrid Print & Mail first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Postalytics on the left and PostGrid Print & Mail on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Postalytics and PostGrid Print & Mail stood in it.
Postalytics first, PostGrid Print & Mail an alternative
9 of 14 modelsPostGrid Print & Mail was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Postalytics alternatives: Lob, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail
Perplexity SonarPostalytics alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
Grok 4.20PFL, Postalytics alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
DeepSeek V4 FlashPostalytics alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
Llama 4 MaverickPostalytics
GLM 4.7 FlashXPostalytics alternatives: DirectMail.io, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
MiniMax M2.5Postalytics alternatives: Lob, PFL, Sendoso
GPT-6 LunaPostalytics alternatives: Lob, Sendoso
Muse Glimmer 30BPostalytics, Sendoso alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
PostGrid Print & Mail first, Postalytics an alternative
2 of 14 modelsPostalytics was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallLob, PostGrid Print & Mail alternatives: Postalytics, Postie
Qwen 3.7 FlashPostGrid Print & Mail alternatives: Lob, Postalytics, Sendoso
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniSendoso alternatives: PFL Direct Mail Platform, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics
Kimi K2Reachdesk alternatives: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Gemini 3.5 FlashSendoso alternatives: Lob, Postal, Reachdesk
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Postalytics leads by fifteen points.
Postalytics43%#1 of 6PostGrid Print & Mail28%#2 of 6Mid-marketThe figures above
Postalytics leads by twenty-two points.
Postalytics40%#1 of 11PostGrid Print & Mail18%#2 of 11Enterprise
The order flips: PostGrid Print & Mail leads at enterprise.
PostGrid Print & Mail14%#2 of 10Postalytics6%#5 of 10What the models said about Postalytics
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Platforms requiring heavy base SaaS subscriptions ($200–$500+/month) on top of per-piece print costs (e.g., higher-tier plans of Postalytics)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Postalytics — verify your exact integrations and security requirements. G2 shows a much smaller review sample than some competitors” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Postalytics (Use Caution Regarding Scale)... their reporting features are often described as basic” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“My default recommendation: Postalytics for a mid-sized B2B company running marketer-led direct-mail campaigns.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Postalytics — Best for Marketers & CRM Integration ... dominate the pure direct mail automation space” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Postalytics for triggered CRM mail and Sendoso for sales-enablement gifting are the practical best fits” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about PostGrid Print & Mail
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid or use with extreme caution: PostGrid (faulty tracking, poor support, low Trustpilot rating, high cost, slow delivery” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“PostGrid - has faulty tracking and is not recommended for teams that are not technical or need global reach.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Faulty tracking, poor customer support (reported response times up to two weeks), and limited functionality” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“1. PostGrid Print & Mail - a web-to-print platform and API that automates the entire process of designing, printing, processing, stuffing, and mailing” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“PostGrid - If you want the best combination of features and value (rated highest at 4.9/5 with no monthly fee for low volumes)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with PostGrid if you want a plug-and-play solution that connects to your CRM easily without needing developer help.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Postalytics vs Click2MailPostalytics vs SendosoPostalytics vs LobPostalytics vs ReachdeskPostalytics vs PFLPostalytics vs Thanks.ioPostGrid Print & Mail vs Click2MailPostGrid Print & Mail vs SendosoPostGrid Print & Mail vs LobPostGrid Print & Mail vs ReachdeskPostGrid Print & Mail vs PFLPostGrid Print & Mail vs Thanks.ioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full direct mail standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.