PR and media monitoring · November 2026 Edition
Agility PR Solutions vs CisionOne
Two of fourteen models named Agility PR Solutions first on the direct prompt; zero named CisionOne. Agility PR Solutions was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and CisionOne by fourteen and Agility PR Solutions carries 30 labels and CisionOne 67, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
By Cision, Chicago, United States, founded 1867. Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate13%43%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3067A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Agility PR Solutions reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Muck Rack was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Muck Rack vs Agility PR Solutions · Muck Rack vs CisionOne · Brand24 vs Agility PR Solutions
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the PR and media monitoring page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Agility PR SolutionsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCisionOne
Direct201 against Agility PR Solutions · 3 against CisionOne
Paraphrase011 against Agility PR Solutions · 7 against CisionOne
Comparative08
Budget-constrained009 against CisionOne
Scale-constrained01
Negative002 against Agility PR Solutions · 10 against CisionOne
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Agility PR Solutions and CisionOne were named in the same answer fifty-two times, of the 58 answers naming Agility PR Solutions and the 195 naming CisionOne. In those answers CisionOne took the first choice eleven times and Agility PR Solutions two.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Agility PR Solutions and CisionOne stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Agility PR Solutions CisionOne first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Agility PR Solutions on the left and CisionOne on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Agility PR Solutions and CisionOne stood in it.
Agility PR Solutions first, CisionOne not the choice
2 of 14 modelsCisionOne was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Agility PR Solutions, Muck Rack alternatives: Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
MiniMax M2.5Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit alternatives: Brand24, Muck Rack
Neither was the first choice, one was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniMuck Rack alternatives: CisionOne, Meltwater
Gemini 3.5 FlashMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Perplexity SonarMeltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24, Muck Rack
Mistral SmallMeltwater, Muck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
DeepSeek V4 FlashMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24
Llama 4 MaverickMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Meltwater, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Qwen 3.7 FlashBrand24, Meltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Kimi K2Brand24, Semrush AI PR Toolkit alternatives: CisionOne
GPT-6 LunaMuck Rack alternatives: CisionOne, Meltwater
Muse Glimmer 30BMeltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24, CisionOne
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Grok 4.20Muck Rack alternatives: Brand24, Meltwater
GLM 4.7 FlashXMuck Rack alternatives: Brand24, Meltwater
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Agility PR Solutions leads by two points.
Agility PR Solutions2%#7 of 12CisionOne0%#12 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Agility PR Solutions4%#5 of 13CisionOne4%#7 of 13Enterprise
The order flips: CisionOne leads at enterprise.
CisionOne21%#2 of 9Agility PR Solutions0%#9 of 9What the models said about Agility PR Solutions
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Verdict: Avoid unless you can negotiate iron-clad data accuracy guarantees and flexible exit terms.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“it appears less commonly favored than Muck Rack or Meltwater for mid-market use” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · soft negative
“Limited traditional media monitoring and mention caps on lower pricing plans.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Prowly or Agility as they hit the sweet spot of enterprise-level features with mid-market pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Agility PR Solutions is specifically recommended for mid-market teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Agility PR Solutions is repeatedly listed as ideal for "organizations and PR teams that require a wide breadth of monitoring sources"” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about CisionOne
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Cision/CisionOne is the clearest "proceed carefully" name: G2 reviewers report data inaccuracy, irrelevant results, and missed coverage” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-level contracts, high cost, not recommended unless you have a dedicated PR team and a substantial budget.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Users experience significant data inaccuracy, as searches often yield irrelevant articles and missed coverage.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Cision - Comprehensive platform offering media database, press release distribution, and monitoring... Strong for B2B with extensive journalist contact information.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For an all-in-one PR department: Choose CisionOne if journalist databases, pitching, press-release distribution, and monitoring must live together.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Cision | Largest journalist database, PR Newswire distribution, enterprise features | Higher cost, complex interface” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared
Muck Rack vs Agility PR SolutionsMuck Rack vs CisionOneBrand24 vs Agility PR SolutionsBrand24 vs CisionOneSemrush AI PR Toolkit vs Agility PR SolutionsSemrush AI PR Toolkit vs CisionOneMeltwater vs Agility PR SolutionsMeltwater vs CisionOneAgility PR Solutions vs AwarioAgility PR Solutions vs Google AlertsAwario vs CisionOneCisionOne vs Google AlertsAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full PR standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.