StackAdapt vs Dianomi
Six of fourteen models named StackAdapt first on the direct prompt; zero named Dianomi. StackAdapt was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Dianomi by nine and StackAdapt carries 43 labels and Dianomi 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
London, founded 2003. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.
By framing
StackAdaptFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDianomi
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
StackAdapt Dianomi first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, StackAdapt on the left and Dianomi on the right.The direct prompt
StackAdapt first, Dianomi not the choice
6 of 14 modelsDianomi was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
StackAdapt2%#5 of 9Dianomi2%#– of 9StackAdapt29%#1 of 10Dianomi2%#7 of 10StackAdapt29%#1 of 10Dianomi4%#– of 10What the models said about StackAdapt
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Avoid Taboola, Outbrain, and StackAdapt if your budget is under $600–$2,000/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“StackAdapt: ~$2,000+ monthly minimum” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“focus on platforms with strong contextual targeting, brand safety controls, and transparent reporting, such as StackAdapt, Viant Technology, or Quantcast Platform” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Dianomi
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd start with Dianomi if your B2B buyers are executives, finance professionals, or IT decision-makers.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Test Dianomi if your buyers are C-suite/finance executives reading tier-1 publications.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
“with Dianomi as a specialist test if the audience is concentrated in finance” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.