Zero of fourteen models named MGID first on the direct prompt; zero named Teads. Both were named by all fourteen models and MGID carries 43 labels and Teads 75, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
By Q28872999, New York City, United States, founded 2005. Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, MGID and Teads were named in the same answer 117 times, of the 130 answers naming MGID and the 227 naming Teads. In those answers Teads took the first choice eight times and MGID twenty-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Frequently cited as an arbitrage platform with low-quality publisher mix.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“These smaller networks carry elevated invalid traffic baselines” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“appear in "top lists" but have scattered complaints about traffic quality or stricter policies—treat them as mid-tier with due diligence” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“MGID stands out as the best native advertising platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“MGID is likely the best starting point for a company with a limited budget.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“or MGID for a mainstream self-serve native network with a $100 minimum deposit” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Taboola and Outbrain - Content Recommendation Widgets ... repeatedly called out for low-intent, curiosity-driven traffic and poor transparency” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Taboola/Outbrain managed accounts: Often require $3,000–$5,000+/month minimums” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid (or approach carefully) with a Small Budget ... Outbrain: Generally requires a minimum of $600 per month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Taboola and Outbrain dominate the content recommendation space with massive reach and premium publisher networks” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Outbrain is often preferred by premium publishers and offers advanced AI-driven personalization and higher CTRs” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“For Advertisers (Tier 1 / Brand Safe): Taboola, Outbrain, Nativo, TripleLift, Yahoo Native, NewsBreak” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.