Twelve of fourteen models named HubSpot Content Hub first on the direct prompt; one named WordPress. Both were named by all fourteen models and HubSpot Content Hub carries 65 labels and WordPress 76, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in six categories this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the content management systems for marketing sites page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, HubSpot Content Hub and WordPress were named in the same answer 185 times, of the 379 answers naming HubSpot Content Hub and the 258 naming WordPress. In those answers WordPress took the first choice forty-three times and HubSpot Content Hub forty-seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Widely regarded as clunky and frustrating for developers and content editors” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Often described as "absolute garbage" for marketing teams” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be cautious even with popular platforms: HubSpot CMS if you need a flexible, marketer-editable site rather than just automation” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Strong for marketing teams already in HubSpot ecosystem. Excellent built-in marketing automation, personalization, analytics, and SEO. Very marketer-friendly.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose HubSpot Content Hub if converting visitors into leads and connecting content to CRM and marketing automation are the top priorities.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid for most marketing teams: ... WordPress when you cannot resource ongoing security and performance hardening” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Unmanaged WordPress installations. WordPress is flexible, but plugin-heavy sites can become slower, harder to maintain, and more exposed to security problems.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tightest cash + you can use a freelancer/hosting: WordPress.org on a managed host. Lowest recurring cost, full ownership, best SEO and growth ceiling.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“The best marketing website CMS for a company with a limited budget is likely to be WordPress.com, as it is considered the best for tight budgets.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with WordPress.org if you have (or can learn) basic technical skills and want maximum control at the lowest price.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.